From 1f998158a988fcf4cd182d9de27e1d8b16cfe474 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mike Yuan Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 21:41:29 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] systemctl: reflect that statically enabled units can be in .upholds/ Follow-up for 38f901791f3c4b1cbd04b71323bbef2fdab65f83 --- src/systemctl/systemctl-enable.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/systemctl/systemctl-enable.c b/src/systemctl/systemctl-enable.c index 940f54607f..4f12f929d2 100644 --- a/src/systemctl/systemctl-enable.c +++ b/src/systemctl/systemctl-enable.c @@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ int verb_enable(int argc, char *argv[], void *userdata) { " \n" /* trick: the space is needed so that the line does not get stripped from output */ "Possible reasons for having this kind of units are:\n" "%1$s A unit may be statically enabled by being symlinked from another unit's\n" - " .wants/ or .requires/ directory.\n" + " .wants/, .requires/, or .upholds/ directory.\n" "%1$s A unit's purpose may be to act as a helper for some other unit which has\n" " a requirement dependency on it.\n" "%1$s A unit may be started when needed via activation (socket, path, timer,\n"