fuzz-calendarspec: increase coverage by calculating occurences
Coverage data shows that we didn't test calendar_spec_next_usec() and associated functions at all. The input samples so far were only used until the first NUL. We take advantage of that by using the part until the second NUL as the starting timestamp, retaining backwards compatibility for how the first part is used.
This commit is contained in:
Binary file not shown.
Reference in New Issue
Block a user