journal: limit decompress_blob() output to DATA_SIZE_MAX (#41604)
We already have checks in place during compression that limit the data
we compress, so they shouldn't decompress to anything larger than
DATA_SIZE_MAX unless they've been tampered with. Let's make this
explicit and limit all our decompress_blob() calls in journal-handling
code to that limit.
One possible scenario this should prevent is when one tries to open and
verify a journal file that contains a compression bomb in its payload:
```
$ ls -lh test.journal
-rw-rw-r--+ 1 fsumsal fsumsal 1.2M Apr 12 15:07 test.journal
$ systemd-run --user --wait --pipe -- build-local/journalctl --verify --file=$PWD/test.journal
Running as unit: run-p682422-i4875779.service
000110: Invalid hash (00000000 vs. 11e4948d73bdafdd)
000110: Invalid object contents: Bad message
File corruption detected at /home/fsumsal/repos/@systemd/systemd/test.journal:272 (of 1249896 bytes, 0%).
FAIL: /home/fsumsal/repos/@systemd/systemd/test.journal (Bad message)
Finished with result: exit-code
Main processes terminated with: code=exited, status=1/FAILURE
Service runtime: 48.051s
CPU time consumed: 47.941s
Memory peak: 8G (swap: 0B)
```
Same could be, in theory, possible with just `journalctl --file=`, but
the reproducer would be a bit more complicated (haven't tried it, yet).
Lastly, the change in journal-remote is mostly hardening, as the maximum
input size to decompress_blob() there is mandated by MHD's connection
memory limit (set to JOURNAL_SERVER_MEMORY_MAX which is 128 KiB at the
time of writing), so the possible output size there is already quite
limited (e.g. ~800 - 900 MiB for xz-compressed data).
This commit is contained in:
@@ -757,6 +757,8 @@ static int decompress_blob_lz4(
|
||||
size = unaligned_read_le64(src);
|
||||
if (size < 0 || (unsigned) size != unaligned_read_le64(src))
|
||||
return -EFBIG;
|
||||
if (dst_max > 0 && (size_t) size > dst_max)
|
||||
return -ENOBUFS;
|
||||
out = greedy_realloc(dst, size, 1);
|
||||
if (!out)
|
||||
return -ENOMEM;
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user