rtnl: rename constructors from the form sd_rtnl_xxx_yyy_new() to sd_rtnl_xxx_new_yyy()
So far we followed the rule to always indicate the "flavour" of constructors after the "_new_" or "_open_" in the function name, so let's keep things in sync here for rtnl and do the same.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ static int add_addresses(sd_rtnl *rtnl, int if_loopback, struct in_addr *ipv4_ad
|
||||
_cleanup_rtnl_message_unref_ sd_rtnl_message *ipv4 = NULL, *ipv6 = NULL;
|
||||
int r;
|
||||
|
||||
r = sd_rtnl_message_addr_new(RTM_NEWADDR, if_loopback, AF_INET, &ipv4);
|
||||
r = sd_rtnl_message_new_addr(RTM_NEWADDR, if_loopback, AF_INET, &ipv4);
|
||||
if (r < 0)
|
||||
return r;
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static int add_addresses(sd_rtnl *rtnl, int if_loopback, struct in_addr *ipv4_ad
|
||||
if (!socket_ipv6_is_supported())
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
r = sd_rtnl_message_addr_new(RTM_NEWADDR, if_loopback, AF_INET6, &ipv6);
|
||||
r = sd_rtnl_message_new_addr(RTM_NEWADDR, if_loopback, AF_INET6, &ipv6);
|
||||
if (r < 0)
|
||||
return r;
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ static int start_interface(sd_rtnl *rtnl, int if_loopback, struct in_addr *ipv4_
|
||||
_cleanup_rtnl_message_unref_ sd_rtnl_message *req = NULL;
|
||||
int r;
|
||||
|
||||
r = sd_rtnl_message_link_new(RTM_SETLINK, if_loopback, &req);
|
||||
r = sd_rtnl_message_new_link(RTM_SETLINK, if_loopback, &req);
|
||||
if (r < 0)
|
||||
return r;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user