SymbX/systemd
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

tree-wide: "<n>bit" → "<n>-bit"

Browse Source 
In some places, "<n> bits" is used when more appropriate.
This commit is contained in:
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
2023-07-02 11:10:12 +01:00
committed by Luca Boccassi
parent 221332ee13
commit da89046643
83 changed files with 221 additions and 224 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
src/basic/time-util.c
+4 -4
View File
@@ -1661,13 +1661,13 @@ int time_change_fd(void) {
if (timerfd_settime(fd, TFD_TIMER_ABSTIME|TFD_TIMER_CANCEL_ON_SET, &its, NULL) >= 0)
return TAKE_FD(fd);
/* So apparently there are systems where time_t is 64bit, but the kernel actually doesn't support
* 64bit time_t. In that case configuring a timer to TIME_T_MAX will fail with EOPNOTSUPP or a
/* So apparently there are systems where time_t is 64-bit, but the kernel actually doesn't support
* 64-bit time_t. In that case configuring a timer to TIME_T_MAX will fail with EOPNOTSUPP or a
* similar error. If that's the case let's try with INT32_MAX instead, maybe that works. It's a bit
* of a black magic thing though, but what can we do?
*
* We don't want this code on x86-64, hence let's conditionalize this for systems with 64bit time_t
* but where "long" is shorter than 64bit, i.e. 32bit archs.
* We don't want this code on x86-64, hence let's conditionalize this for systems with 64-bit time_t
* but where "long" is shorter than 64-bit, i.e. 32-bit archs.
*
* See: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/14362 */