tree-wide: "<n>bit" → "<n>-bit"
In some places, "<n> bits" is used when more appropriate.
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Luca Boccassi
parent
221332ee13
commit
da89046643
@@ -3972,7 +3972,7 @@ union bpf_attr {
|
||||
*
|
||||
* u64 bpf_jiffies64(void)
|
||||
* Description
|
||||
* Obtain the 64bit jiffies
|
||||
* Obtain the 64-bit jiffies
|
||||
* Return
|
||||
* The 64 bit jiffies
|
||||
*
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1093,7 +1093,7 @@ struct ethtool_rx_flow_spec {
|
||||
/* How rings are laid out when accessing virtual functions or
|
||||
* offloaded queues is device specific. To allow users to do flow
|
||||
* steering and specify these queues the ring cookie is partitioned
|
||||
* into a 32bit queue index with an 8 bit virtual function id.
|
||||
* into a 32-bit queue index with an 8 bit virtual function id.
|
||||
* This also leaves the 3bytes for further specifiers. It is possible
|
||||
* future devices may support more than 256 virtual functions if
|
||||
* devices start supporting PCIe w/ARI. However at the moment I
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user