Rename {dual,triple}_timestamp_get to {dual,triple}_timestamp_now

Those functions take a pointer to a timestamp and return a timestamp pointer,
so the reader would be justified to think that those are just getters. Rename
them to avoid confusion.
This commit is contained in:
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
2023-11-13 13:27:07 +01:00
parent 6f510ec8d6
commit fa5a025167
31 changed files with 46 additions and 46 deletions
+3 -3
View File
@@ -1779,7 +1779,7 @@ static bool unit_test_condition(Unit *u) {
assert(u);
dual_timestamp_get(&u->condition_timestamp);
dual_timestamp_now(&u->condition_timestamp);
r = manager_get_effective_environment(u->manager, &env);
if (r < 0) {
@@ -1803,7 +1803,7 @@ static bool unit_test_assert(Unit *u) {
assert(u);
dual_timestamp_get(&u->assert_timestamp);
dual_timestamp_now(&u->assert_timestamp);
r = manager_get_effective_environment(u->manager, &env);
if (r < 0) {
@@ -2740,7 +2740,7 @@ void unit_notify(Unit *u, UnitActiveState os, UnitActiveState ns, bool reload_su
/* Update timestamps for state changes */
if (!MANAGER_IS_RELOADING(m)) {
dual_timestamp_get(&u->state_change_timestamp);
dual_timestamp_now(&u->state_change_timestamp);
if (UNIT_IS_INACTIVE_OR_FAILED(os) && !UNIT_IS_INACTIVE_OR_FAILED(ns))
u->inactive_exit_timestamp = u->state_change_timestamp;