Otherwise, LIST_REMOVE() in network_free() fails.
This fixes the following assertion:
```
systemd-networkd[2595]: Bus bus-api-network: changing state UNSET → OPENING
systemd-networkd[2595]: Bus bus-api-network: changing state OPENING → AUTHENTICATING
systemd-networkd[2595]: timestamp of '/etc/systemd/network' changed
systemd-networkd[2595]: /etc/systemd/network/10-hoge.network:1: Invalid section header '[Network]Address=192.168.0.1'
systemd-networkd[2595]: /etc/systemd/network/10-hoge.network:1: Failed to parse file: Bad message
systemd-networkd[2595]: Assertion '*_head == _item' failed at ../../home/watanabe/git/systemd/src/network/networkd-network.c:378, function network_free(). Aborting.
valgrind[2595]: ==2595==
valgrind[2595]: ==2595== Process terminating with default action of signal 6 (SIGABRT): dumping core
valgrind[2595]: ==2595== at 0x4BCA53F: raise (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.28.so)
valgrind[2595]: ==2595== by 0x4BB4894: abort (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.28.so)
valgrind[2595]: ==2595== by 0x4955F09: log_assert_failed_realm (log.c:795)
valgrind[2595]: ==2595== by 0x417101: network_free (networkd-network.c:378)
valgrind[2595]: ==2595== by 0x415E99: network_freep (networkd-network.h:282)
valgrind[2595]: ==2595== by 0x416AB2: network_load_one (networkd-network.c:101)
valgrind[2595]: ==2595== by 0x416C39: network_load (networkd-network.c:293)
valgrind[2595]: ==2595== by 0x414031: manager_load_config (networkd-manager.c:1502)
valgrind[2595]: ==2595== by 0x40B258: run (networkd.c:82)
valgrind[2595]: ==2595== by 0x40B74A: main (networkd.c:117)
valgrind[2595]: ==2595==
valgrind[2595]: ==2595== HEAP SUMMARY:
valgrind[2595]: ==2595== in use at exit: 32,621 bytes in 201 blocks
valgrind[2595]: ==2595== total heap usage: 746 allocs, 545 frees, 241,027 bytes allocated
valgrind[2595]: ==2595==
valgrind[2595]: ==2595== LEAK SUMMARY:
valgrind[2595]: ==2595== definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
valgrind[2595]: ==2595== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
valgrind[2595]: ==2595== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
valgrind[2595]: ==2595== still reachable: 32,621 bytes in 201 blocks
valgrind[2595]: ==2595== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
valgrind[2595]: ==2595== Reachable blocks (those to which a pointer was found) are not shown.
valgrind[2595]: ==2595== To see them, rerun with: --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all
valgrind[2595]: ==2595==
valgrind[2595]: ==2595== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
valgrind[2595]: ==2595== ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
systemd-coredump[2600]: Process 2595 (memcheck-amd64-) of user 192 dumped core.
```
If an IPv6 route is added with a source address that is still
tentative, the kernel will refuse to install it.
Previously, once we sent the messages to the kernel to add the
addresses, we would immediately proceed to add the routes. The
addresses would usually still be tentative at this point, so
adding static IPv6 routes was broken - see issue #5882.
Now, only begin to configure routes once the addresses are ready,
by restructuring the state machine, and tracking when addresses are
ready, not just added.
Fixes: #5882
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
c4397d94c3 introduces
link_detach_from_manager() and netdev_detach_from_manager(), and they
set Link::manager or NetDev::manager NULL.
But, at the time e.g. link is removed, hence link_drop() is called,
there may be still some asynchronous netlink call is waiting, and
their callbacks hit assertion.
This make {link,netdev}_detach_from_manager() just drop all references
from manager, but keep the pointer to manager.
Fixes#11411.
Found by inspecting results of running this small program:
int main(int argc, const char **argv) {
for (int i = 1; i < argc; i++) {
FILE *f;
char line[1024], prev[1024], *r;
int lineno;
prev[0] = '\0';
lineno = 1;
f = fopen(argv[i], "r");
if (!f)
exit(1);
do {
r = fgets(line, sizeof(line), f);
if (!r)
break;
if (strcmp(line, prev) == 0)
printf("%s:%d: error: dup %s", argv[i], lineno, line);
lineno++;
strcpy(prev, line);
} while (!feof(f));
fclose(f);
}
}
We're about to need it to be later in the file for the next commit.
Moving it now means that when we change it in the next commit, it's
not intermingled with the move.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
This has been irritating me for quite a while: let's prefix these enum
values with a common prefix, like we do for almost all other enums.
No change in behaviour, just some renaming.
fdopen doesn't accept "e", it's ignored. Let's not mislead people into
believing that it actually sets O_CLOEXEC.
From `man 3 fdopen`:
> e (since glibc 2.7):
> Open the file with the O_CLOEXEC flag. See open(2) for more information. This flag is ignored for fdopen()
As mentioned by @jlebon in #11131.
An earlier commit 0e408b82b (dhcp6-client: handle IAID with value zero)
introduced a flag to sd_dhcp6_client to distinguish between an unset
IAID and a value set to zero.
However, that was not sufficient and broke leaving the setting
uninitialized in networkd configuration. The configuration parsing
also must distinguish between the default, unset value and an
explict zero configuration.
Fixes: 0e408b82b8
Susant Sahani
Fabrice Fontaine
Lennart Poettering
Yu Watanabe
Daniel Axtens
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Topi Miettinen
Topi Miettinen
rogerjames99
Chris Down
Thomas Haller