If another bound interface (dummy98) will be removed before that dummy99
is processed by udevd, then removing dummy98 in the next step makes the
target interface (test1) bring down.
Follow-up for 3e2f7c46da.
The script has a shebang and .sh extension, so make it executable
W: systemd-tests: script-not-executable [usr/lib/systemd/tests/testdata/units/assert.sh]
The outstanding kernel panic should be already fixed in recent enough
kernels by [0]. To make the test safe to run anywhere, let's implement
a simple kernel version check and run the test only if we're running
with at least kernel 6.x. The patch might be in some 5.x kernels as
well, but let's be on the safe side and use 6.x as a baseline here
(which is currently the case for Arch and Fedora Rawhide anyway).
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/7b3fd03e1a46047e5ffe2a389fe74501f0a93206.1656519221.git.sd@queasysnail.net/T/#u
- use `udevadm wait` instead of `udevadm info --wait-initialized`,
- use `timeout` command instead of the fixed time sleep,
- add basic tests for #25106,
- add brief comment about #25115.
This fix unfortunately introduced a much worse regression that
is affecting many users, so let's revert it for now and rework
it in the next release.
This reverts commit 5ded3917a1.
Fixes https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/24984
The lists of directives for fuzzer tests are maintained manually in the
repo. There is a tools/check-directives.sh script that runs during test
phase and reports stale directive lists.
Let's rework the script into a generator so that these directive files
are created on-the-flight and needn't be updated whenever a unit file
directives change. The scripts is rewritten in Python to get rid of gawk
dependency and each generated file is a separate meson target so that
incremental builds refresh what is just necessary (and parallelize
(negligible)).
Note: test/fuzz/fuzz-unit-file/directives-all.slice is kept since there
is not automated way to generate it (it is not covered by the check
script neither).
The precise bounds of the scheduling priority depend on the scheduling policy,
so depending on the order in which the two settings are specified the
validation might pass or fail.
When checking the setting only validate the outer range (valid values in general are 0 to 99),
and let the execution fail later if the priority does not match the
specified policy (1 to 99 for RR/FIFO, 0 for the rest).
Fixes https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/20320
Quoting https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/25050#discussion_r998721845:
This part seems to be quite racy, at least in the C8S job:
[ 1767.520856] H testsuite-15.sh[35]: *** test transient slice drop-ins
[ 1767.520856] H testsuite-15.sh[35]: + mkdir -p /etc/systemd/system/slice.d
[ 1767.522480] H testsuite-15.sh[35]: + mkdir -p /etc/systemd/system/a-.slice.d
[ 1767.524992] H testsuite-15.sh[35]: + mkdir -p /etc/systemd/system/a-b-.slice.d
[ 1767.526799] H testsuite-15.sh[35]: + mkdir -p /etc/systemd/system/a-b-c.slice.d
[ 1767.528302] H testsuite-15.sh[35]: + echo -e '[Unit]\nDocumentation=man:drop1'
[ 1767.528434] H testsuite-15.sh[35]: + echo -e '[Unit]\nDocumentation=man:drop2'
[ 1767.528519] H testsuite-15.sh[35]: + echo -e '[Unit]\nDocumentation=man:drop3'
[ 1767.528595] H testsuite-15.sh[35]: + echo -e '[Unit]\nDocumentation=man:drop4'
[ 1767.528676] H testsuite-15.sh[35]: + systemctl cat a-b-c.slice
[ 1767.541321] H systemctl[1042]: No files found for a-b-c.slice.
[ 1767.542854] H systemd[1]: testsuite-15.service: Main process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE
[ 1767.542995] H systemd[1]: testsuite-15.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'.
[ 1767.543360] H systemd[1]: Failed to start testsuite-15.service.
[ 1767.543542] H systemd[1]: testsuite-15.service: Consumed 1.586s CPU time.
[ 1767.543938] H systemd[1]: Reached target testsuite.target.
[ 1767.545737] H systemd[1]: Starting end.service...
Otherwise we might hit a race where we read the test log just before
it's fully written to the disk:
```
======================================================================
FAIL: test_interleaved (__main__.ExecutionResumeTest.test_interleaved)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/root/systemd/test/test-exec-deserialization.py", line 170, in test_interleaved
self.check_output(expected_output)
File "/root/systemd/test/test-exec-deserialization.py", line 111, in check_output
self.assertEqual(output, expected_output)
AssertionError: 'foo\n' != 'foo\nbar\n'
foo
+ bar
```
With some debug:
```
test_interleaved (__main__.ExecutionResumeTest.test_interleaved) ...
Assertion failed; file contents just after the assertion:
b'foo\n'
File contents 5 seconds later:
b'foo\nbar\n'
FAIL
```
Seen quite often in CentOS CI on the fast baremetal machines.
(s) is just ugly with a vibe of DOS. In most cases just using the normal plural
form is more natural and gramatically correct.
There are some log_debug() statements left, and texts in foreign licenses or
headers. Those are not touched on purpose.
TEST-69 uses a Python wrapper around the systemd-nspawn call, which on
error calls the `spawn.terminate()` method. However, with no arguments
it will only use SIGHUP and SIGINT signals - this might leave a stuck
container around, causing fails if the test is run again. With `force=True`
SIGKILL is used as well (if necessary).
TEST-34 complains in `test_check_writable` when running with gcov, as
the build directory tree is not writable with DynamicUser=true. As I had
no luck with $GCOV_PREFIX and other runtime gcov configuration, let's
just ignore the gcov errors for this test.
Yu Watanabe
Frantisek Sumsal
Luca Boccassi
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Michal Koutný
Quentin Deslandes