These assertions impose an include order between <linux/fs.h> and
"missing_fs.h", specifically <linux/fs.h> can't be included before
"missing_fs.h". This makes automated include refactoring very painful,
so let's get rid of these assertions and instead assume that linux/fs.h
does the right thing.
Now that the necessary functions from log.h have been moved to macro.h,
we can stop including log.h in macro.h. This requires modifying source
files all over the tree to include log.h instead.
To resolve conflict with sys/mount.h and linux/mount.h or linux/fs.h.
The conflict between sys/mount.h and linux/mount.h is resolved in
glibc-2.37 (774058d72942249f71d74e7f2b639f77184160a6), but our baseline
is still glibc-2.31. Also, even with the version or newer, still
sys/mount.h conflicts with linux/fs.h, which is included by
linux/btrfs.h.
This introduces our own implementation of sys/mount.h, that can be
simultaneously included with linux/mount.h and linux/fs.h. This also
imports linux/fs.h, linux/mount.h, and several other dependent headers.
The introduced sys/mount.h header itself may not be enough simple, but
by using the header, we can drop most of workarounds in other source files.
Coverity gets confused since the iterator change, so add an
assert to indicate that this is allocated if n_old_groups is > 0
CID#1545922
Follow-up for 125cca1b51
Kinda sad, that interfaces like this exist in 2024. But let's deal with
it: before we access "struct btrfs_ioctl_search_header" let's copy it
out, and access it only in the aligned copy.
Fixes: #31282
The structure we copy this out is a large (unaligned) binary blob, hence
let's better use the memdup_suffix0() so that gcc doesn't make
assumption about the source being a valid string.
Given that ERRNO_IS_NOT_SUPPORTED() also matches positive values,
make sure this macro is not called with arguments that do not have
errno semantics.
In this case the arguments passed to ERRNO_IS_NOT_SUPPORTED() are the
values returned by btrfs_subvol_make_fd() which is not expected to
return any positive values, but let's be consistent anyway and move
ERRNO_IS_NOT_SUPPORTED() invocations to the branches where
the return values are known to be negative.
When making ephemeral snapshots of subvolumes whose cleanup depends on
whether they're locked or not, it's necessary to have the lock from the
very beginning, so let's support that with a new BTRFS_SNAPSHOT_LOCK_BSD
flag.
The kernel has had filesystem independent reflink ioctls for a
while now, let's try to use them and fall back to the btrfs specific
ones if they're not supported.
Let's make btrfs_get_block_device_fd() more generic by renaming it
to btrfs_get_block_device_at() so it can operate on only paths, dir_fd
and path, or only on fd by using xopenat().
Let's explicitly let btrfs know when we're done using a loop device.
Otherwise, btrfs will keep the device UUID cached which will result
in mount() failures if we ever generate a device or filesystem with
the same UUID again.
-1 was used everywhere, but -EBADF or -EBADFD started being used in various
places. Let's make things consistent in the new style.
Note that there are two candidates:
EBADF 9 Bad file descriptor
EBADFD 77 File descriptor in bad state
Since we're initializating the fd, we're just assigning a value that means
"no fd yet", so it's just a bad file descriptor, and the first errno fits
better. If instead we had a valid file descriptor that became invalid because
of some operation or state change, the other errno would fit better.
In some places, initialization is dropped if unnecessary.
When the flag COPY_ALL_XATTRS is set, it causes the complete set of xattrs
to be copied. If the flag is unset, only xattrs from the "user" namespace
are copied.
Fixes#17178.
The goal is to move everything that requires selinux or smack
away from src/basic/. This means that src/basic/label.[ch] must move,
which implies btrfs-util.[ch], copy.[ch], and a bunch of other files
which form a cluster of internal use.
This is just moving text around, so there should be no functional difference.
test-blockdev-util is new, because path_is_encrypted() is moved to
blockdev-util.c, and so far we didn't have any tests for code there.