Use CONST_ALIGN_TO to express the compile-time overflow check for
the ALIGN(sizeof(sd_bus_message)) + sizeof(BusMessageHeader)
allocation, since ALIGN() is not constexpr.
CID#1548031
Follow-up for de1c301ed1
Coverity flags arithmetic in BUS_MESSAGE_SIZE(),
BUS_MESSAGE_BODY_BEGIN() and message_from_header() as potential
overflows. The values are validated at message creation time, but
add asserts to make the invariants explicit for static analyzers.
CID#1548023
CID#1548030
CID#1548046
Follow-up for 6629161f82
In the event that we can't receive all of the fds from the message
(which can happen for a number of reasons including LSM denials or
hitting the fd limit of the process) the kernel will set the MSG_CTRUNC
flag. Through our use of recvmsg_safe() we've been treating this as a
fatal error, which will result in dropping the connection.
Let's dial that back a bit: we can receive the message, but when the
user attempts to access the missing fds via sd_bus_message_read_basic()
we can return the (existing) error code of -EBADMSG to indicate that the
fd is missing.
We can do this by using recvmsg() directly, and relaxing some of the
checks on message creation: when (and only when) we have received
MSG_CTRUNC we allow a smaller than expected (per the header) number of
fds to be present. The error check in sd_bus_message_read_basic() was
already there so we don't need to do anything about that.
This puts the receiver of the message into a difficult situation: you
can call sd_bus_message_read_basic() as often as you want but as long as
it keeps returning -EBADMSG it won't progress through the message and
you won't be able to close whatever container you're in. That means
that the user will probably need to abandon processing the message
anyway. So why not just drop the message up front? This approach is
more likely to yield a useful error message, which will be invaluable
for people trying to track down problems caused by LSM denials.
Fixes#34688
This renames e.g. struct bus_body_part -> BusMessageBodyPart to
follow our usual coding style. Also, several struct and enum
declarations are moved to relevant headers.
Also, this introduces bus-forward.h.
For libsystemd's headers, the changes made depend on whether the
header is installed or not. For installed headers, the only change
made is that commonly included headers were moved to _sd-common.h.
For these headers, there should be no noticeable change in behavior
when including them. For non-installed headers, includes were replaced
with forward declarations where possible as usual.
Split out of #37344.
Now that the necessary functions from log.h have been moved to macro.h,
we can stop including log.h in macro.h. This requires modifying source
files all over the tree to include log.h instead.
The function isn't necessarily fast (it's O(n)), and there's no reason
to have it defined as inline function, since it's neither fast, nor
entirely trivial.
This is preparation for #28891, which adds a bunch more helpers around
"struct iovec", at which point this really deserves its own .c/.h file.
The idea is that we sooner or later can consider "struct iovec" as an
entirely generic mechanism to reference some binary blob, and is the
go-to type for this purpose whenever we need one.
-1 was used everywhere, but -EBADF or -EBADFD started being used in various
places. Let's make things consistent in the new style.
Note that there are two candidates:
EBADF 9 Bad file descriptor
EBADFD 77 File descriptor in bad state
Since we're initializating the fd, we're just assigning a value that means
"no fd yet", so it's just a bad file descriptor, and the first errno fits
better. If instead we had a valid file descriptor that became invalid because
of some operation or state change, the other errno would fit better.
In some places, initialization is dropped if unnecessary.
The usual: if we find that function useful, other users of the library
will too. In particular, the v-variants are necessary to build pass-thru
wrappers.
Let's define two helpers strdupa_safe() + strndupa_safe() which do the
same as their non-safe counterparts, except that they abort if called
with allocations larger than ALLOCA_MAX.
This should ensure that all our alloca() based allocations are subject
to this limit.
afaics glibc offers three alloca() based APIs: alloca() itself,
strndupa() + strdupa(). With this we have now replacements for all of
them, that take the limit into account.
In general we almost never hit those asserts in production code, so users see
them very rarely, if ever. But either way, we just need something that users
can pass to the developers.
We have quite a few of those asserts, and some have fairly nice messages, but
many are like "WTF?" or "???" or "unexpected something". The error that is
printed includes the file location, and function name. In almost all functions
there's at most one assert, so the function name alone is enough to identify
the failure for a developer. So we don't get much extra from the message, and
we might just as well drop them.
Dropping them makes our code a tiny bit smaller, and most importantly, improves
development experience by making it easy to insert such an assert in the code
without thinking how to phrase the argument.
We recently started making more use of malloc_usable_size() and rely on
it (see the string_erase() story). Given that we don't really support
sytems where malloc_usable_size() cannot be trusted beyond statistics
anyway, let's go fully in and rework GREEDY_REALLOC() on top of it:
instead of passing around and maintaining the currenly allocated size
everywhere, let's just derive it automatically from
malloc_usable_size().
I am mostly after this for the simplicity this brings. It also brings
minor efficiency improvements I guess, but things become so much nicer
to look at if we can avoid these allocation size variables everywhere.
Note that the malloc_usable_size() man page says relying on it wasn't
"good programming practice", but I think it does this for reasons that
don't apply here: the greedy realloc logic specifically doesn't rely on
the returned extra size, beyond the fact that it is equal or larger than
what was requested.
(This commit was supposed to be a quick patch btw, but apparently we use
the greedy realloc stuff quite a bit across the codebase, so this ends
up touching *a*lot* of code.)