The ability to use inet_pton(AF_INET6, ...) doesn't depend on kernel
ipv6 support (inet_pton is a pure libc function), so make ipv6 address
parsing tests unconditional.
Snapshots were never useful or used for anything. Many systemd
developers that I spoke to at systemd.conf2015, didn't even know they
existed, so it is fairly safe to assume that this type can be deleted
without harm.
The fundamental problem with snapshots is that the state of the system
is dynamic, devices come and go, users log in and out, timers fire...
and restoring all units to some state from the past would "undo"
those changes, which isn't really possible.
Tested by creating a snapshot, running the new binary, and checking
that the transition did not cause errors, and the snapshot is gone,
and snapshots cannot be created anymore.
New systemctl says:
Unknown operation snapshot.
Old systemctl says:
Failed to create snapshot: Support for snapshots has been removed.
IgnoreOnSnaphost settings are warned about and ignored:
Support for option IgnoreOnSnapshot= has been removed and it is ignored
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2015-November/034872.html
Let's make sure "LimitCPU=30min" can be parsed properly, following the
usual logic how we parse time values. Similar for LimitRTTIME=.
While we are at it, extend a bit on the man page section about resource
limits.
Fixes: #1772
This is useful if we want to parse RLIMIT_RTTIME values where the common
UNIX syntax is without any units but refers to a non-second unit (µs in
this case), but where we want to allow specification of units.
memory_erase() so far just called memset(), which the compiler might
optimize away under certain conditions if it feels there's benefit in
it. C11 knows a new memset_s() call that is like memset(), but may not
be optimized away. Ideally, we'd just use that call, but glibc currently
does not support it. Hence, implement our own simplistic version of it.
We use a GCC pragma to turn off optimization for this call, and also use
the "volatile" keyword on the pointers to ensure that gcc will use the
pointers as-is. According to a variety of internet sources, either one
does the trick. However, there are also reports that at least the
volatile thing isn't fully correct, hence let's add some snake oil and
employ both techniques.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4711346
Tests for the functions defined in src/basic/parse-util.c. Reorder them
to match the order in which the functions are defined in the source
file. Adjusted the list of include files to remove the ones no longer
needed in test-util.c.
Tested that `make check` still passes as expected. Also checked the
number of lines removed from test-util.c matches the expected, as an
additional verification that no tests were dropped or duplicated in the
move.
Tested CPUAffinity ranges on both a service unit and in system.conf and
confirmed they work as expected (by inspecting /proc/PID/status, for the
main pid of the service and for pid 1). Also mixed ranges with both
spaces, commas, trailing commas and spaces.
Added new tests to increase coverage of ranges and prevent regressions.
Tested CPUAffinity settings on both a service unit and in system.conf
and confirmed they work as expected.
Added a new test to confirm that trailing commas and spaces work and to
prevent any regressions in that area.
The files are named too generically, so that they might conflict with
the upstream project headers. Hence, let's add a "-util" suffix, to
clarify that this are just our utility headers and not any official
upstream headers.
So far we had two pretty much identical calls in user-util.[ch]:
lookup_uid() and uid_to_name(). Get rid of the former, in favour of the
latter, and while we are at it, rewrite it, to use getpwuid_r()
correctly, inside an allocation loop, as POSIX intended.
Marcin Bachry
Martin Pitt
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Lennart Poettering
Evgeny Vereshchagin
Daniel Mack
Ronny Chevalier
Filipe Brandenburger