IN C23, thread_local is a reserved keyword and we shall therefore
do nothing to redefine it. glibc has it defined for older standard
version with the right conditions.
v2 by Yu Watanabe:
Move the definition to missing_threads.h like the way we define e.g.
missing syscalls or missing definitions, and include it by the users.
Co-authored-by: Yu Watanabe <watanabe.yu+github@gmail.com>
Before:
====
$ systemctl edit network.target
Failed to create directories for "/etc/systemd/system/network.target.d/override.conf": No such file or directory
====
After:
====
$ systemctl edit network.target
Failed to create directories for "/etc/systemd/system/network.target.d/override.conf": Permission denied
====
Fixes#26652.
This ensures that shell string escape operations will not produce output
with invalid UTF-8 from the input by escaping invalid UTF-8 data as if
they were single byte characters.
We checked ERRNO_IS_NOT_SUPPORTED on a possible positive non-error code,
which isn't right.
Fix that. Also add caching, since we are about to call this more often.
We should check alignment *after* determining the pointer points into
our pool, not before. Otherwise might might end up checking alignment of
the pointer relative to our base, even though it is taken relative to
some other base.
Follow-up for: a2b052b29f
See: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/26393#issuecomment-1442295012
If the timezone is specified with a number e.g. +0900 or so, then
let's parse the time as a UTC, and adjust it with the specified time
shift.
Otherwise, if an area has timezone change, e.g.
---
Africa/Casablanca Sun Jun 17 01:59:59 2018 UT = Sun Jun 17 01:59:59 2018 +00 isdst=0 gmtoff=0
Africa/Casablanca Sun Jun 17 02:00:00 2018 UT = Sun Jun 17 03:00:00 2018 +01 isdst=1 gmtoff=3600
Africa/Casablanca Sun Oct 28 01:59:59 2018 UT = Sun Oct 28 02:59:59 2018 +01 isdst=1 gmtoff=3600
Africa/Casablanca Sun Oct 28 02:00:00 2018 UT = Sun Oct 28 03:00:00 2018 +01 isdst=0 gmtoff=3600
---
then we could not determine isdst from the timezone (+01 in the above)
and mktime() will provide wrong results.
Fixes#26370.
This function was moved from cgroup-util.c to cgroup-setup.c a while
back, but the prototype in the matching header files wasn't migrated.
Let's fix that.
This just adds the base functionality and some unit tests.
With TABLE_TIMESTAMP_RELATIVE we print "5s ago" and "5s left",
with the new TABLE_TIMESTAMP_LEFT, we print "5s ago" but "5s".
This is more useful for cases where we generally only want to
print timestamps in the future.
Typically, in reasonably complex programs we want to realease various
caches (such as glibc allocation caches) in case of memory pressure.
Let's add explicit infrastructure for that to sd-event, that can hook
Linux' Pressure Stall Information (PSI) logic with our event loop.
This adds sd_event_add_memory_pressure() as easy, one-step API to
install an even source that is called under memory pressure.
The parameters which file to watch (the per-cgroup PSI file, or the
system-wide file /proc/pressure/memory) can be configured via env vars.
The idea is that the service manager sooner or later gains controls for
setting this up correctly.
Alternatively to the PSI a similar logic is supported but instead of
waiting for POLLPRI on a procfs/cgroupfs fd we'll wait for POLLIN on
FIFO or AF_UNIX sockets. This is useful for testing, and possibly in
other environments, for example to hook up this protocol directly with
GNOME's low memory monitor.
By default this watches on the cgroup-local PSI so that we aren't
affected by pressure on cgroups we are not related to.
Most of the support for valgrind was under HAVE_VALGRIND_VALGRIND_H, i.e. we
would enable if the valgrind headers were found. The operations then we be
conditionalized on RUNNING_UNDER_VALGRIND.
But in a few places we had code which was conditionalized on VALGRIND, i.e. the
config option. I noticed because I compiled with -Dvalgrind=true on a machine
that didn't have valgrind.h, and the build failed because
RUNNING_UNDER_VALGRIND was not defined. My first idea was to add a check that
the header is present if the option is set, but it seems better to just remove
the option. The code to support valgrind is trivial, and if we're
!RUNNING_UNDER_VALGRIND, it has negligible cost. And the case of running under
valgrind is always some special testing/debugging mode, so we should just do
those extra steps to make valgrind output cleaner. Removing the option makes
things simpler and we don't have to think if something should be covered by the
one or the other configuration bit.
I had a vague recollection that in some places we used -Dvalgrind=true not
for valgrind support, but to enable additional cleanup under other sanitizers.
But that code would fail to build without the valgrind headers anyway, so
I'm not sure if that was still used. If there are uses like that, we can
extend the condition for cleanup_pools().
Daan De Meyer
Cristian RodríguezandYu Watanabe
Lennart Poettering
Luca Boccassi
msizanoen1
Frantisek Sumsal
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
David Tardon