Commit Graph
20 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Paul Meyer 1b1900a6f3 test: add TEST-92-TPM2-SWTPM for the software TPM fallback
Boot a VM in EFI mode without a hardware/firmware TPM and with
systemd.tpm2_software_fallback=yes, so systemd-tpm2-generator manufactures a
software TPM on the ESP in the initrd and chainloads swtpm. Assert the service
starts, the vtpm-proxy device shows up, and a systemd-creds TPM2 seal/unseal
round-trip works. Then reboot and confirm the sealed secret still unseals,
i.e. the TPM state persisted on the ESP across the reboot.

Signed-off-by: Paul Meyer <katexochen0@gmail.com>
2026-06-25 09:39:55 +02:00
Luca Boccassi 14f773ce5e test: add integration test for LUO 2026-05-15 13:46:08 +01:00
Christian Brauner e28aab8840 RestrictFileSystemAccess= — dm-verity filesystem access enforcement via BPF LSM (#41340)
This series adds a new `RestrictFileSystemAccess=` setting in the
`[Manager]` section of `system.conf` that enforces a deny-default
execution policy: only binaries residing on signed dm-verity block
devices (and the initramfs during early boot) are permitted to execute.
Everything else — tmpfs, procfs, sysfs, anonymous executable mappings,
unsigned dm-verity devices — is denied.

The directive takes the values `no` (default), `exec` (lock down
execution), and accepts `yes` as an alias for `exec`. The name is
deliberately broader than what the initial values cover so the same
setting can grow to restrict other filesystem access categories in the
future (e.g. `any` to deny all access from untrusted filesystems, not
just execution).

### How it works

The BPF program is entirely self-contained; PID1 loads it and the kernel
does the rest. When dm-verity brings up a device, the kernel calls
`security_bdev_setintegrity()` twice during `verity_preresume()`: once
with the root hash and once with the signature validity status. Our
`lsm/bdev_setintegrity` hook captures the second call and records the
device number in a BPF hash map if the signature is valid. When a device
is torn down, `lsm/bdev_free_security` cleans up the map entry. No
userspace map population is needed at any point.

The enforcement side hooks `bprm_check_security` (execve), `mmap_file`
(PROT_EXEC mappings including shared libraries), and `file_mprotect`
(W→X transitions like JIT and libffi). Each hook resolves the file's
backing device via `file->f_inode->i_sb->s_dev` and looks it up in the
verity device map. For block-backed filesystems, `s_dev` equals
`s_bdev->bd_dev`, which avoids an extra pointer chase and NULL check on
`s_bdev` — non-block filesystems simply miss in the map and get denied
by the default policy.

During early boot the initramfs needs to be trusted as well, since it
runs before any dm-verity volume is mounted. PID1 writes the initramfs
superblock's device number into a BPF global before attaching the
programs, and clears it after `switch_root` to close the trust window.
As a prerequisite, PID1 also verifies that
`dm_verity.require_signatures=1` is active — without it, unsigned
dm-verity devices could be created, which would weaken the security
model even though the BPF program would correctly deny execution from
them.

### Surviving daemon-reexec

The BPF programs and their verity device map must survive PID1
re-execution (daemon-reexec, switch_root, soft-reboot). Without
preservation, `manager_free()` would destroy the skeleton, the link FDs
would close, programs would detach, and the map would be freed. After
exec, a fresh skeleton would have an empty map — but existing dm-verity
devices have already signaled their integrity and won't do so again. A
deny-default policy plus an empty map means all execution denied and the
system is bricked.

We solve this by serializing the raw BPF link FDs and the `.bss` map FD
across exec using systemd's existing `serialize_fd` / `fdset_cloexec` /
`deserialize_fd` infrastructure. The kernel reference chain (link FD →
`struct bpf_link` → `struct bpf_prog` → `struct bpf_map`) keeps programs
attached and map data intact as long as the dup'd FDs survive. After
exec, PID1 detects the deserialized FDs and skips skeleton re-creation
entirely. If switching root, it uses the deserialized `.bss` map FD to
clear `initramfs_s_dev` via a targeted `mmap()` write, preserving the
other guard globals in `.bss`.

We intentionally avoid bpffs pinning. Pinned objects are discoverable
and manipulable by any process with sufficient privileges
(`BPF_OBJ_GET`, unlink). FD serialization keeps everything private to
PID1 with no external attack surface.

### Self-protection

BPF LSM programs attached via the tracing trampoline (`BPF_LSM_MAC`) are
inherently tamper-resistant — `bpf_tracing_link_lops` has no
`.update_prog` and no `.detach` callbacks, so the kernel rejects
`BPF_LINK_UPDATE` with `-EINVAL` and `BPF_LINK_DETACH` with
`-EOPNOTSUPP`. Once attached, our programs cannot be modified or
detached through the `bpf()` syscall.

The remaining attack vector is map injection: `BPF_MAP_GET_FD_BY_ID` to
obtain an FD to `verity_devices`, then `BPF_MAP_UPDATE_ELEM` to insert a
fake trusted device. The self-protection guard blocks this with three
hooks. `lsm/bpf_map` fires inside `bpf_map_new_fd()`, the chokepoint for
all code paths that produce a map FD, and denies access to our map IDs
from any process other than PID1 (identified via `tgid == 1`, which is
unspoofable — `bpf_get_current_pid_tgid()` reads `current->tgid` from
`pid->numbers[0].nr`, the init-namespace PID). `lsm/bpf_prog` provides
analogous protection for program FDs as defense-in-depth. `lsm/bpf`
handles `BPF_LINK_GET_FD_BY_ID` at the command level since there is no
`security_bpf_link()` hook in the kernel.

The guard starts inactive — all protected IDs default to 0 in `.bss`,
and no real BPF object has ID 0 — so there is no window where it
interferes with PID1's own setup. After attaching all programs, PID1
queries the kernel-assigned IDs via `bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd()` and
writes them into the guard's globals. From that point on, the guard is
active. The guard has zero collateral damage: it only denies access to
our specific object IDs, leaving bpftrace, bpftool,
`RestrictFileSystems=`, and all other BPF usage completely unaffected.

Additionally, a ptrace guard (`lsm/ptrace_access_check`) blocks
`PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH` to PID1 from other processes, preventing extraction
of sensitive state from PID1's address space via ptrace, `/proc/1/mem`,
`process_vm_readv()`, or `pidfd_getfd()`. `PTRACE_MODE_READ` is allowed
so that monitoring tools and `systemctl` continue to work normally.

### Limitations

- The enforcement hooks resolve trust by looking at
`file->f_inode->i_sb->s_dev` — the device number of the superblock that
owns the file's inode. This works correctly for files directly on a
dm-verity block device, but it does not see through overlayfs. When a
file is accessed on an overlay mount, `f_inode` points to the overlay
inode, and `i_sb->s_dev` is the overlay superblock's anonymous device
number — not the underlying dm-verity device. The overlay superblock has
no backing block device, so the lookup misses in the verity map and
execution is denied by the default policy.

This means that overlayfs mounts whose lower layers are on
dm-verity-protected volumes will currently have execution blocked, even
though the actual data is integrity-protected. The correct fix requires
a kernel extension that allows the BPF program to call something like
`d_real_inode()` to resolve through the overlay to the real inode on the
underlying filesystem, and then check that inode's superblock device
number against the verity map. I plan to add a BPF kfunc exposing this
functionality in a follow-up kernel series.

- Multi-device filesystems such as btrfs use entirely synthetic device
numbers and there is no way to reach the actual device backing the inode
from the inode itself. So `RestrictFileSystemAccess=` only works
reliably with a subset of filesystems. In practice this isn't a problem
because the feature is tailored to erofs; using it on arbitrary
filesystems requires careful vetting of the actual filesystem behaviour.

- The initial implementation also blocks JIT-style execution that relies
on memory mapped executable. This is part of `exec` semantics today and
can be loosened later by introducing finer-grained values (a common
pattern in systemd — following the precedent of `ProtectSystem=`, which
started as a boolean and later grew `auto`/`yes`/`full`/`strict`
semantics).

- The configuration is a system-wide setting with no per-unit opt-out.
This is intentional for the initial implementation: a global invariant
is easier to reason about and harder to accidentally weaken. Per-unit
relaxation can be added later if a concrete need arises.

### Testing

The series includes unit tests and integration tests covering both the
core enforcement logic and the self-protection guard. The unit test
loads the skeleton, attaches programs, populates guard globals, and
verifies that protected IDs are set correctly. The integration tests
exercise the guard by attempting `BPF_MAP_GET_FD_BY_ID` and
`BPF_PROG_GET_FD_BY_ID` from a non-PID1 process and verifying that
access is denied.

What we cannot currently test end-to-end is actual execution enforcement
against a dm-verity-signed root filesystem. The systemd test suite does
not yet have infrastructure for booting a VM with a signed dm-verity
rootfs image — the existing mkosi-based test framework lacks the ability
to produce and boot such images. This will hopefully change soon when
Daan integrates barrage into the test suite.

Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner (Amutable) <brauner@kernel.org>
2026-05-13 13:58:46 +02:00
Daan De Meyer 7cc5d161e6 test: Modernize btrfs tests
Convert test-btrfs to use the test framework and
assertions, merge the physical offset test into it
and beef it up to include what TEST-83-BTRFS does and
finally get rid of TEST-83-BTRFS as it is unneeded now.
2026-05-13 13:47:18 +02:00
Christian Brauner 5439911f59 test: add integration tests for RestrictFileSystemAccess= BPF LSM
Add TEST-90-RESTRICT-FSACCESS with two subtests:

config subtest — Tests PID1's RestrictFileSystemAccess= configuration parsing and
failure modes via system.conf drop-ins and daemon-reexec:
 - Default RestrictFileSystemAccess=no produces no log messages
 - RestrictFileSystemAccess=yes without BPF LSM logs appropriate warning
 - RestrictFileSystemAccess=yes without require_signatures is correctly rejected
   by the test helper binary's precondition check

enforce subtest — Tests actual BPF LSM enforcement using a test helper
binary (test-bpf-restrict-fsaccess) that loads the BPF skeleton with
initramfs_s_dev set to the rootfs s_dev, pins BPF links, and exits:
 - Execution from rootfs continues to work (trusted via initramfs_s_dev)
 - Execution from tmpfs is blocked with EPERM
 - Execution from a signed dm-verity device is allowed, driven via
   systemd-run -p RootImage= against the pre-built signed minimal_0
   images that mkosi ships and signs at image build time (no on-the-fly
   squashfs / verity hash tree / signature build required)
 - After BPF detach, enforcement is lifted

All tests skip gracefully when prerequisites are not met (BPF LSM, BPF
framework, dm-verity tools, signing keys).

Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2026-05-13 10:36:12 +02:00
Daan De Meyer 0d57260976 TEST-75-RESOLVED: Make sure --suppress-sync is not used 2026-04-14 20:35:24 +02:00
Daan De Meyer 316d17fcbd core: Add support for CPU pressure notifications
Works the same way as memory pressure notifications. Code is refactored
to work on enum arrays to reduce duplication.
2026-04-09 22:47:10 +02:00
Yu Watanabe 862b61a3a1 test: merge TEST-76-SYSCTL into TEST-87-AUX-UTILS-VM 2025-10-06 03:26:28 +09:00
Frantisek Sumsal 953c347fb6 test: rename TEST-53-ISSUE-16347 to TEST-53-TIMER
And split the existing test into a separate subtest.
2025-09-24 09:52:36 +02:00
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek c5dcbd073e meson: use files() not find_program() for helper scripts
We went back and forth between 'prog.sh', files('prog.sh'), and
find_program('prog.sh'). We want to use files() or find_program() so that we
get a good error message if the file is missing. Behaviour of meson changed
over time, and in the past not all forms could be used in all places. For
example 0f4c4f3824 added find_program() in many
places to avoid repeated messages. But it seems that all recent meson versions
work fine with files().

find_program prints silly messages:
  Program tools/make-man-index.py found: YES
       (/home/zbyszek/src/systemd/tools/make-man-index.py)
  Program tools/meson-render-jinja2.py found: YES
       (/home/zbyszek/src/systemd/tools/meson-render-jinja2.py)
  ...
We know that those files will be found, they are part of the git checkout.
With files() this is gone and the meson output is easier to read.
2025-07-25 14:04:17 +02:00
Yu Watanabe 62c3f42deb test: move testcase_dependencies() to TEST-10-MOUNT
TEST-60-MOUNT_RATELIMIT is run on nspawn by default, and currently run
on vm only on arch mkosi. Let's move the test case to new TEST-10-MOUNT,
which always run on vm.
2025-07-25 04:54:42 +09:00
7eb276dced test: resolve: add integration tests for browsing services
Co-authored-by: Frantisek Sumsal <frantisek@sumsal.cz>
Co-authored-by: Vishwanath Chandapur <vishwanath.chandapur@philips.com>
2025-07-17 19:41:22 +05:30
Matteo Croce 030b227cec test: add test for systemd upgrade
Add a basic test to check that systemd works after an upgrade
2025-06-18 09:51:21 +01:00
Daan De Meyer 710653d3bc test: Use meson add_test_setup() instead of environment variables
We add a default test setup that excludes the integration-tests suite
so that the integration tests don't run by default. This allows us to
get rid of $SYSTEMD_INTEGRATION_TESTS. Then, we add two extra setups:
'integration' and 'shell'. The 'integration' setup does not exclude the
integration-tests suite, and so can be used to run the integration tests.
The 'shell' setup does the same, but additionally sets $TEST_SHELL=1,
allowing to get rid of $TEST_SHELL in the docs.
2025-04-17 20:31:08 +02:00
Daan De Meyer 9c8646646c integration-tests: Don't enable tpm for every single test 2025-04-11 06:20:25 +09:00
Daan De Meyer 5b21c43e98 test: Be smarter about detecting the mkosi configuration directory
Instead of always looking up two directories from the
test/integration-tests/meson.build file, let's search in up to 4
parent directories from the given meson project source root. This
allows us to just pass in meson.project_source_root() to
integration-test-wrapper.py instead of having to pass in a fixed
relative offset from the current meson file.

It'll also allow us to install the integration tests and mkosi
configuration in the future without breaking the standalone
integrationt tests functionality;
2025-04-03 10:21:54 +02:00
Daan De Meyer 48e19280b2 test: Use test.service template for all integration tests
Instead of having some tests have their own unit, let's make
test.service.in generic enough so that it works for all integration
tests.
2025-04-02 21:58:59 +02:00
Daan De Meyer 29a1e7df64 test: Mark tests as skipped if requirements were not satisfied
Instead of not creating the test at all, let's always create test but
simply mark them as skipped as this is more observable than simply not
creating the test at all.
2025-03-28 11:40:39 +01:00
Daan De Meyer 51b4920746 test: Boot integration test VMs without an initrd if possible
If we don't need an initrd, let's not waste time in one. We have to
gate this by distributions that have the necessary kernel modules to
make this work as builtin modules, hopefully we can expand the list in
the future.
2025-03-28 11:40:39 +01:00
Daan De Meyer d9f48358bd test: Make it possible to run the integration tests standalone
Currently, to run the integration tests, it's still necessary to
install various other build tools besides meson: A compiler, gperf,
libcap, ... which we want to avoid in CI systems where we receive
prebuilt systemd packages and only want to test them. Examples are
Debian's autopkgtest CI and Fedora CI. Let's make it possible for
these systems to run the integration tests without having to install
any other build dependency besides meson by extracting the logic
required to run the integration tests with meson into a separate
subdirectory and adding a standalone top-level meson.build file which
can be used to configure a meson tree with as its only purpose running
the integration tests.

Practically, we do the following:
- all the integration test directories and integration-test-wrapper.py
  are moved from test/ to test/integration-test/.
- All the installation logic is kept out of test/integration-test/ or
  any of its subdirectories and moved into test/meson.build instead.
- We add test/integration-test/standalone/meson.build to run the
  integration tests standalone. This meson file includes
  test/integration-test via a cute symlink hack to trick meson into
  including a parent directory with subdir().
- Documentation is included on how to use the new standalone mode.
- TEST-64-UDEV-STORAGE and TEST-85-NETWORK are changed to generate separate
  units for each testcase to make them behave more like the other integration
  tests.
2025-03-27 21:37:13 +01:00