Use the flags MEMFD_EXEC or MEMFD_NOEXEC_SEAL as applicable.
These warnings instruct the kernel wether the memfd is executable or
not.
Without specifying those flags the kernel will emit the following
warning since version 6.3,
commit 105ff5339f49 ("mm/memfd: add MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL and MFD_EXEC"):
kernel: memfd_create() without MFD_EXEC nor MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL, pid=1 'systemd'
-1 was used everywhere, but -EBADF or -EBADFD started being used in various
places. Let's make things consistent in the new style.
Note that there are two candidates:
EBADF 9 Bad file descriptor
EBADFD 77 File descriptor in bad state
Since we're initializating the fd, we're just assigning a value that means
"no fd yet", so it's just a bad file descriptor, and the first errno fits
better. If instead we had a valid file descriptor that became invalid because
of some operation or state change, the other errno would fit better.
In some places, initialization is dropped if unnecessary.
We have free_and_replace() and friends, they are all named with lower
letters, even they are macros, not functions.
For consistency, let's rename CLOSE_AND_REPLACE() with lower letters.
This also mekes the macro used more places.
The goal is to move everything that requires selinux or smack
away from src/basic/. This means that src/basic/label.[ch] must move,
which implies btrfs-util.[ch], copy.[ch], and a bunch of other files
which form a cluster of internal use.
This is just moving text around, so there should be no functional difference.
test-blockdev-util is new, because path_is_encrypted() is moved to
blockdev-util.c, and so far we didn't have any tests for code there.
Thomas Weißschuh
Daan De Meyer
Lennart Poettering
Yu Watanabe
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek