"Link-local" and "link local" are used throughout man pages and program
output, with the former used far more than the latter. This commit makes
it consistent throughout the project.
Accessing the various arguments always through argv[] is nasty, since
it's not obvious what we are talking about here. Let's give things nice
names.
We did the same in cryptsetup a while back.
Let's upgrade log levels of some noteworthy messages from LOG_DEBUG to
LOG_NOTICE. These messages contain information that previous log
messages in the error path didn't say, namely that we'll now fall back
to traditional unlocking.
Note that this leaves similar log messages for cases where
TPM2/PKCS#11/FIDO2 support is disabled at build at LOG_DEBUG, since in
that case nothing really failed, we just systematically can't do
TPM2/PKCS#11/FIDO2 and hence it is pointless and not actionable for
users to do anything about it...
The are so many different flavours of functions that attach volumes,
hence say explicitly that these are about libcryptsetup plugins, and
nothing else.
Just some renaming, no code changes beyond that.
Currently, there exist only two MTU sources, static and DHCPv4, and they
are exclusive. Hence, it is not necessary to check the existence of the
MTU option in the acquired DHCP lease. Let's unconditionally reset the
MTU. Note that, if the current and original MTU are equivalent, then
link_request_to_set_mtu() handles that gracefully.
The commit 6706ce2fd2 made
IgnoreCarrierLoss= setting also take timespan, to make users handle
issues like #18738 or #20887. But still users needed to explicitly set
a timespan.
This makes networkd automatically determine the timeout when the
situations #18738 or #19832 is detected. Unfortunately, still users have
issue #20887 need to specify a value.
Closes#19832.
The function was named confusingly and we managed to confused ourselves. The
parameter was assigned incorrectly and then reassigned correctly in the caller.
Let's simplify the whole thing by just saving the optarg param.
I considered moving the unhexmemming and/or reading of the file to the parse
function, but decided against it. I think it's nicer to parse all options
before opening external files.
Some filesystems (e.g. zfs with compression!=off, which is the default
configuration) automatically hole-punch all-zero blocks ‒ write a block
full of ones instead
A single device cannot have more than a single proportional control
policy at the same time. So either io.bfq.weight or io.weight will
always fail. Process the resulting values and emit a warning message
only when none was really configured.
This patch also drops warnings when setting [blk]io.bfq.weight fails,
the code would be too convoluted otherwise.
Old kernels (795fe54c2a82 ("bfq: Add per-device weight") v5.4) won't
allow io.bfq.weight per-device configuration, don't get too excited
about it but give the user one warning message to be aware this settings
don't apply.
We would only accept "identical" links, but having e.g. a symlink
/usr/lib/systemd/system/foo-alias.service → /usr/lib/systemd/system/foo.service
when we're trying to create /usr/lib/systemd/system/foo-alias.service →
./foo.service is OK. This fixes an issue found in ubuntuautopkg package
installation, where we'd fail when enabling systemd-resolved.service, because
the existing alias was absolute, and (with the recent patches) we were trying
to create a relative one.
A test is added.
(For .wants/.requires symlinks we were already doing OK. A test is also
added, to verify.)
When we have a symlink that goes outside of our search path, we should just
ignore the target file name. But we were verifying it, and rejecting in
the case where a symlink was created manually.
The two states are distinguished, but are treated everywhere identically,
so there is no difference in behaviour except for slighlty different log
output.
We'd say that file is enabled indirectly if we had a symlink like:
foo@.service ← bar.target.wants/foo@one.service
but not when we had
foo@one.service ← bar.target.wants/foo@one.service
The effect of both link types is the same. In fact we don't care
about the symlink target. (We'll warn if it is mismatched, but we honour
it anyway.)
So let's use the original match logic only for aliases.
For .wants/.requires we instead look for a matching source name,
or a source name that matches after stripping of instance.
This is a fairly noticable change, but I think it needs to be done.
So far we'd create an absolute symlink to the target unit file:
.wants/foo.service → /usr/lib/systemd/system/foo.service
or
alias.service → /etc/systemd/system/aliased.service.
This works reasonably well, except in one case: where the unit file
is linked. When we look at a file link, the name of the physical file
isn't used, and we only take the account the symlink source name.
(In fact, the destination filename may not even be a well-formed unit name,
so we couldn't use it, even if we wanted to.) But this means that if
a file is linked, and specifies aliases, we'd create absolute links for
those aliases, and systemd would consider each "alias" to be a separate
unit. This isn't checked by the tests here, because we don't have a running
systemd instance, but it is easy enough to check manually.
The most reasonable way to fix this is to create relative links to the
unit file:
.wants/foo.service → ../foo.service
alias.service → aliased.service.
I opted to use no prefix for aliases, both normal and 'default.target',
and to add "../" for .wants/ and .requires/. Note that the link that is
created doesn't necessarily point to the file. E.g. if we're enabling
a file under /usr/lib/systemd/system, and create a symlink in /etc/systemd/system,
it'll still be "../foo.service", not "../../usr/lib/systemd/system/foo.service".
For our unit loading logic this doesn't matter, and figuring out a path
that actually leads somewhere would be more work. Since the user is allowed
to move the unit file, or add a new unit file in a different location, and
we don't actually follow the symlink, I think it's OK to create a dangling
symlink. The prefix of "../" is useful to give a hint that the link points
to files that are conceptually "one level up" in the directory hierarchy.
With the relative symlinks, systemd knows that those are aliases.
The tests are adjusted to use the new forms. There were a few tests that
weren't really testing something useful: 'test -e x' fails if 'x' is a
a dangling symlink. Absolute links in the chroot would be dangling, even
though the target existed in the expected path, but become non-dangling
when made relative and the test fails.
This should be described in NEWS, but I'm not adding that here, because
it'd likely result in conflicts.
We use the symlink source name and destination names to decide whether to remove
the symlink. But if the source name is enough to decide to remove the symlink,
we'd still look up the destination for no good reason. This is a slow operation,
let's skip it.
I linked a file as root, so I had a symlink /root/test.service ← /etc/systemd/system/test.service.
To my surpise, when running test-systemctl-enable, it failed with a cryptic EACCES.
The previous commit made the logs a bit better. Strace shows that we
were trying to follow the symlink without taking --root into account.
It seems that this bug was introduced in 66a19d85a5:
before it, we'd do readlink_malloc(), which returned a path relative to root. But
we only used that path for checking if the path is in remove_symlinks_to set, which
contains relative paths. So if the path was relative, we'd get a false-negative
answer, but we didn't go outside of the root. (We need to canonicalize the symlink
to get a consistent answer.) But after 66a19 we use chase_symlinks(), without taking
root into account which is completely bogus.
When chase_symlinks() fails, we'd get the generic error:
Failed to disable: Permission denied.
Let's at least add the failure to changes list, so the user gets
a slightly better message. Ideally, we'd say where exactly the permission
failure occured, but chase_symlinks() is a library level function and I don't
think we should add logging there. The output looks like this now:
Failed to resolve symlink "/tmp/systemctl-test.1r7Roj/etc/systemd/system/link5alias2.service": Permission denied
Failed to resolve symlink "/tmp/systemctl-test.1r7Roj/etc/systemd/system/link5alias.service": Permission denied
Failed to disable unit, file /tmp/systemctl-test.1r7Roj/etc/systemd/system/link5alias2.service: Permission denied.
Failed to disable unit, file /tmp/systemctl-test.1r7Roj/etc/systemd/system/link5alias.service: Permission denied.
Sebastian Pucilowski
Lennart Poettering
Yu Watanabe
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
наб
Michal Koutný