When /boot or friends is on btrfs RAID, btrfs_get_block_device_at() will
succeed with 0 and provide zero devnum. Then,
- if we are previleged, devname_from_devnum() maps the devnum to
/run/systemd/inaccessible/blk, and the subsequent verification by blkid
will fail,
- if we are unprevileged, sd_device_new_from_devnum() will fail.
This makes
- when find_esp() or find_xbootldr() is called without any paths, that
is, called with the searching mode, then returns -ENOKEY, which should
be handled gracefully by the caller,
- when they are called with an input path, then they provide the proper
error message and suggestion.
Fixes RHBZ#2251262 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2251262).
The image name is extracted from the image path originally passed in,
i.e. not the contents of the image. And the image UUID is directly
retrieved from the partition table, hence also not from the contents.
Let's hence move the comment to separate out the stuff extract from the
file systems (and thus only available when mounting/with privs/with
block devices) from the data available without any of that.
This is the common case in --user instances, hence handle this
gracefully.
This should be safe since user instances won't get access to
/dev/console-related ttys anyway, but only their own ptys.
The original version would yield a slightly _unexpected_ message for
this [Address] section:
[Address]
Address=10.9.3.1/24
HomeAddress=yes
ManageTemporaryAddress=yes
systemd-networkd[68396]: /run/systemd/network/25-address-static.network: unexpected address flags "n/a" were configured. Ignoring [Address] section from line 144.
Let's instead show the unexpected flags:
systemd-networkd[69160]: /run/systemd/network/25-address-static.network: unexpected address flags "home-address,manage-temporary-address" were configured. Ignoring [Address] section from line 144.
Currently, start/stop messages for device units are not used, since
job_perform_on_unit() does nothing and we simply wait for unit status
change. I think we still want some nice log messages explaining what
the start jobs for devices are doing, so let's fix this.
Just use ExecParam directly, as these are all internal to sd-exec now
anyway. Avoids double close when execution fails after FDs are set up
for inheritance and were already re-arranged.
Fixes https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/30412
Follow-up for 5b6319dcee (gosh this is
ancient), and effectively reverts 3dead8d925.
sigwait() is documented to "suspend execution of the calling thread
until one of the signals specified in the signal set becomes pending".
And the only error it returns is EINVAL, when "set contains an invalid
signal number". Therefore, there's no need to run it in a loop or
to check for runtime error.
When assert_return() is critical, the following assertion is triggered
on exit:
---
#0 0x00007f8b1f6b0884 in __pthread_kill_implementation () from target:/lib64/libc.so.6
#1 0x00007f8b1f65fafe in raise () from target:/lib64/libc.so.6
#2 0x00007f8b1f64887f in abort () from target:/lib64/libc.so.6
#3 0x00007f8b208d02d6 in log_assert_failed (text=0x7f8b210009e0 "e->state != SD_EVENT_FINISHED", file=0x7f8b20fff403 "src/libsystemd/sd-event/sd-event.c",
line=1252, func=0x7f8b21004400 <__func__.154> "sd_event_add_io") at ../src/basic/log.c:948
#4 0x00007f8b208d0457 in log_assert_failed_return (text=0x7f8b210009e0 "e->state != SD_EVENT_FINISHED",
file=0x7f8b20fff403 "src/libsystemd/sd-event/sd-event.c", line=1252, func=0x7f8b21004400 <__func__.154> "sd_event_add_io") at ../src/basic/log.c:967
#5 0x00007f8b20c7d102 in sd_event_add_io (e=0x617000000080, ret=0x60c000000a20, fd=11, events=1, callback=0x7dfd85 <ipv4acd_on_packet>,
userdata=0x60c000000a00) at ../src/libsystemd/sd-event/sd-event.c:1252
#6 0x00000000007e3934 in sd_ipv4acd_start (acd=0x60c000000a00, reset_conflicts=true) at ../src/libsystemd-network/sd-ipv4acd.c:597
#7 0x00000000007e72b9 in ipv4ll_start_internal (ll=0x6080000006a0, reset_generation=true) at ../src/libsystemd-network/sd-ipv4ll.c:278
#8 0x00000000007e7462 in sd_ipv4ll_start (ll=0x6080000006a0) at ../src/libsystemd-network/sd-ipv4ll.c:298
#9 0x00000000006047a1 in dhcp4_handler (client=0x617000000400, event=0, userdata=0x61a000000680) at ../src/network/networkd-dhcp4.c:1183
#10 0x000000000075b1ed in client_notify (client=0x617000000400, event=0) at ../src/libsystemd-network/sd-dhcp-client.c:783
#11 0x000000000075bf8d in client_stop (client=0x617000000400, error=0) at ../src/libsystemd-network/sd-dhcp-client.c:821
#12 0x000000000077710f in sd_dhcp_client_stop (client=0x617000000400) at ../src/libsystemd-network/sd-dhcp-client.c:2388
#13 0x000000000065cdd1 in link_stop_engines (link=0x61a000000680, may_keep_dhcp=true) at ../src/network/networkd-link.c:336
#14 0x000000000041f214 in manager_free (m=0x618000000080) at ../src/network/networkd-manager.c:613
#15 0x00000000004124e3 in manager_freep (p=0x7f8b1c800040) at ../src/network/networkd-manager.h:128
#16 0x00000000004139f6 in run (argc=1, argv=0x7ffffe4522e8) at ../src/network/networkd.c:24
#17 0x0000000000413b20 in main (argc=1, argv=0x7ffffe4522e8) at ../src/network/networkd.c:119
---
Prompted by https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/30049#issuecomment-1844087965.
By making assert_return() critical, we observe the following:
---
Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
0x00007f01320b0884 in __pthread_kill_implementation () from /lib64/libc.so.6
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00007f01320b0884 in __pthread_kill_implementation ()
from /lib64/libc.so.6
#1 0x00007f013205fafe in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#2 0x00007f013204887f in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#3 0x00007f01338d02d6 in log_assert_failed (
text=0x7f01340009e0 "e->state != SD_EVENT_FINISHED",
file=0x7f0133fff403 "src/libsystemd/sd-event/sd-event.c", line=1399,
func=0x7f01340045a0 <__func__.148> "sd_event_add_time")
at ../src/basic/log.c:948
#4 0x00007f01338d0457 in log_assert_failed_return (
text=0x7f01340009e0 "e->state != SD_EVENT_FINISHED",
file=0x7f0133fff403 "src/libsystemd/sd-event/sd-event.c", line=1399,
func=0x7f01340045a0 <__func__.148> "sd_event_add_time")
at ../src/basic/log.c:967
#5 0x00007f0133c7ed83 in sd_event_add_time (e=0x617000022280,
ret=0x610000007e98, clock=7, usec=24054941030, accuracy=0,
callback=0x4625b4 <on_announcement_timeout>, userdata=0x610000007e40)
at ../src/libsystemd/sd-event/sd-event.c:1399
#6 0x00007f0133c7f725 in sd_event_add_time_relative (e=0x617000022280,
ret=0x610000007e98, clock=7, usec=1000000, accuracy=0,
callback=0x4625b4 <on_announcement_timeout>, userdata=0x610000007e40)
at ../src/libsystemd/sd-event/sd-event.c:1462
#7 0x0000000000464cac in dns_scope_announce (scope=0x610000007e40, goodbye=true) at ../src/resolve/resolved-dns-scope.c:1530
#8 0x0000000000504d08 in link_free (l=0x612000023d40) at ../src/resolve/resolved-link.c:83
#9 0x000000000052dbbd in manager_free (m=0x619000000a80) at ../src/resolve/resolved-manager.c:697
#10 0x0000000000562328 in manager_freep (p=0x7f012f800040) at ../src/resolve/resolved-manager.h:198
#11 0x000000000056315a in run (argc=1, argv=0x7fff22b06468) at ../src/resolve/resolved.c:25
#12 0x0000000000563284 in main (argc=1, argv=0x7fff22b06468) at ../src/resolve/resolved.c:99
---
Prompted by https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/30049#issuecomment-1844087965.
I was wondering why I couldn't trigger the assertion in safe_fclose()
when submitting #30251. It turned out that the static destructor was
not run at all :/
Replace main() with a minimized version of main-func.h. This also
prevents emitting negative exit codes.
Yu Watanabe
Lennart Poettering
David Tardon
Mike Yuan
Frantisek Sumsal
Luca Boccassi
Daan De Meyer
ksaleem
