(The one case that is left unchanged is '< <(subcommand)'.)
This way, the style with no gap was already dominant. This way, the reader
immediately knows that ' < ' is a comparison operator and ' << ' is a shift.
In a few cases, replace custom EOF replacement by just EOF. There is no point
in using someting like "_EOL" unless "EOF" appears in the text.
Due to the limitation of `GITHUB_TOKEN` when running workflows from forks,
it's required to split the `development_freeze` workflow in two.
* First workflow will run on the `pull_request` trigger and save the PR
number in the artifact. This workflow is running with read-only permissions
on `GITHUB_TOKEN`.
* Second workflow will get triggered on `workflow_run`. It will be run
directly in the `systemd/systemd` context and can get permission to be
able to create comments on PR.
GITHUB_TOKEN limitations:
* https://docs.github.com/en/actions/security-guides/automatic-token-authentication#permissions-for-the-github_token
GitHub Security Labs Article - How to correctly and safely overcome GITHUB_TOKEN limitations:
* https://securitylab.github.com/research/github-actions-preventing-pwn-requests/