networkd: rework warning and debug messages about address addition and removal
Those messages were quite confusing. In particular "adding address" suggests that we are assiging a new address to an interface, but in fact we're just reacting to a notification about an addition. So let's call that "remembering" and "forgetting". It's not fully gramatically correct, but I think it's much clearer than "adding"/"removing" in this context. And "received address without address" is too cryptic, let's say "address message" to distinguish the message from its content. Also, make failure to format address non-fatal, and print more details in various places.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -499,7 +499,7 @@ int manager_rtnl_process_address(sd_netlink *rtnl, sd_netlink_message *message,
|
||||
if (sd_netlink_message_is_error(message)) {
|
||||
r = sd_netlink_message_get_errno(message);
|
||||
if (r < 0)
|
||||
log_warning_errno(r, "rtnl: failed to receive address, ignoring: %m");
|
||||
log_warning_errno(r, "rtnl: failed to receive address message, ignoring: %m");
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -509,49 +509,49 @@ int manager_rtnl_process_address(sd_netlink *rtnl, sd_netlink_message *message,
|
||||
log_warning_errno(r, "rtnl: could not get message type, ignoring: %m");
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
} else if (!IN_SET(type, RTM_NEWADDR, RTM_DELADDR)) {
|
||||
log_warning("rtnl: received unexpected message type when processing address, ignoring");
|
||||
log_warning("rtnl: received unexpected message type %d when processing address, ignoring.", type);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
r = sd_rtnl_message_addr_get_ifindex(message, &ifindex);
|
||||
if (r < 0) {
|
||||
log_warning_errno(r, "rtnl: could not get ifindex from address, ignoring: %m");
|
||||
log_warning_errno(r, "rtnl: could not get ifindex from message, ignoring: %m");
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
} else if (ifindex <= 0) {
|
||||
log_warning("rtnl: received address message with invalid ifindex, ignoring: %d", ifindex);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
r = link_get(m, ifindex, &link);
|
||||
if (r < 0 || !link) {
|
||||
/* when enumerating we might be out of sync, but we will
|
||||
* get the address again, so just ignore it */
|
||||
if (!m->enumerating)
|
||||
log_warning("rtnl: received address for nonexistent link (%d), ignoring", ifindex);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
r = link_get(m, ifindex, &link);
|
||||
if (r < 0 || !link) {
|
||||
/* when enumerating we might be out of sync, but we will get the address again, so just
|
||||
* ignore it */
|
||||
if (!m->enumerating)
|
||||
log_warning("rtnl: received address for link %d we don't know about, ignoring", ifindex);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
r = sd_rtnl_message_addr_get_family(message, &family);
|
||||
if (r < 0 || !IN_SET(family, AF_INET, AF_INET6)) {
|
||||
log_link_warning(link, "rtnl: received address with invalid family, ignoring");
|
||||
log_link_warning(link, "rtnl: received address message with invalid family, ignoring.");
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
r = sd_rtnl_message_addr_get_prefixlen(message, &prefixlen);
|
||||
if (r < 0) {
|
||||
log_link_warning_errno(link, r, "rtnl: received address with invalid prefixlen, ignoring: %m");
|
||||
log_link_warning_errno(link, r, "rtnl: received address message with invalid prefixlen, ignoring: %m");
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
r = sd_rtnl_message_addr_get_scope(message, &scope);
|
||||
if (r < 0) {
|
||||
log_link_warning_errno(link, r, "rtnl: received address with invalid scope, ignoring: %m");
|
||||
log_link_warning_errno(link, r, "rtnl: received address message with invalid scope, ignoring: %m");
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
r = sd_rtnl_message_addr_get_flags(message, &flags);
|
||||
if (r < 0) {
|
||||
log_link_warning_errno(link, r, "rtnl: received address with invalid flags, ignoring: %m");
|
||||
log_link_warning_errno(link, r, "rtnl: received address message with invalid flags, ignoring: %m");
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -559,7 +559,7 @@ int manager_rtnl_process_address(sd_netlink *rtnl, sd_netlink_message *message,
|
||||
case AF_INET:
|
||||
r = sd_netlink_message_read_in_addr(message, IFA_LOCAL, &in_addr.in);
|
||||
if (r < 0) {
|
||||
log_link_warning_errno(link, r, "rtnl: received address without valid address, ignoring: %m");
|
||||
log_link_warning_errno(link, r, "rtnl: received address message without valid address, ignoring: %m");
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -568,7 +568,7 @@ int manager_rtnl_process_address(sd_netlink *rtnl, sd_netlink_message *message,
|
||||
case AF_INET6:
|
||||
r = sd_netlink_message_read_in6_addr(message, IFA_ADDRESS, &in_addr.in6);
|
||||
if (r < 0) {
|
||||
log_link_warning_errno(link, r, "rtnl: received address without valid address, ignoring: %m");
|
||||
log_link_warning_errno(link, r, "rtnl: received address message without valid address, ignoring: %m");
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -579,10 +579,8 @@ int manager_rtnl_process_address(sd_netlink *rtnl, sd_netlink_message *message,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
r = in_addr_to_string(family, &in_addr, &buf);
|
||||
if (r < 0) {
|
||||
log_link_warning_errno(link, r, "Could not print address, ignoring: %m");
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (r < 0)
|
||||
log_link_warning_errno(link, r, "Could not print address: %m");
|
||||
|
||||
r = sd_netlink_message_read_cache_info(message, IFA_CACHEINFO, &cinfo);
|
||||
if (r < 0 && r != -ENODATA) {
|
||||
@@ -598,38 +596,40 @@ int manager_rtnl_process_address(sd_netlink *rtnl, sd_netlink_message *message,
|
||||
switch (type) {
|
||||
case RTM_NEWADDR:
|
||||
if (address)
|
||||
log_link_debug(link, "Updating address: %s/%u (valid %s%s)", buf, prefixlen,
|
||||
log_link_debug(link, "Remembering updated address: %s/%u (valid %s%s)",
|
||||
strnull(buf), prefixlen,
|
||||
valid_str ? "for " : "forever", strempty(valid_str));
|
||||
else {
|
||||
/* An address appeared that we did not request */
|
||||
r = address_add_foreign(link, family, &in_addr, prefixlen, &address);
|
||||
if (r < 0) {
|
||||
log_link_warning_errno(link, r, "Failed to add address %s/%u, ignoring: %m", buf, prefixlen);
|
||||
log_link_warning_errno(link, r, "Failed to remember foreign address %s/%u, ignoring: %m",
|
||||
strnull(buf), prefixlen);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
} else
|
||||
log_link_debug(link, "Adding address: %s/%u (valid %s%s)", buf, prefixlen,
|
||||
log_link_debug(link, "Remembering foreign address: %s/%u (valid %s%s)",
|
||||
strnull(buf), prefixlen,
|
||||
valid_str ? "for " : "forever", strempty(valid_str));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
r = address_update(address, flags, scope, &cinfo);
|
||||
if (r < 0) {
|
||||
log_link_warning_errno(link, r, "Failed to update address %s/%u, ignoring: %m", buf, prefixlen);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* address_update() logs internally, so we don't need to. */
|
||||
(void) address_update(address, flags, scope, &cinfo);
|
||||
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
case RTM_DELADDR:
|
||||
|
||||
if (address) {
|
||||
log_link_debug(link, "Removing address: %s/%u (valid %s%s)", buf, prefixlen,
|
||||
log_link_debug(link, "Forgetting address: %s/%u (valid %s%s)",
|
||||
strnull(buf), prefixlen,
|
||||
valid_str ? "for " : "forever", strempty(valid_str));
|
||||
(void) address_drop(address);
|
||||
} else
|
||||
log_link_warning(link, "Removing non-existent address: %s/%u (valid %s%s), ignoring", buf, prefixlen,
|
||||
valid_str ? "for " : "forever", strempty(valid_str));
|
||||
log_link_info(link, "Kernel removed an address we don't remember: %s/%u (valid %s%s), ignoring.",
|
||||
strnull(buf), prefixlen,
|
||||
valid_str ? "for " : "forever", strempty(valid_str));
|
||||
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
default:
|
||||
assert_not_reached("Received invalid RTNL message type");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user