networkd: rework warning and debug messages about address addition and removal

Those messages were quite confusing. In particular "adding address" suggests
that we are assiging a new address to an interface, but in fact we're just
reacting to a notification about an addition. So let's call that "remembering"
and "forgetting". It's not fully gramatically correct, but I think it's much
clearer than "adding"/"removing" in this context.

And "received address without address" is too cryptic, let's say "address
message" to distinguish the message from its content.

Also, make failure to format address non-fatal, and print more details in
various places.
This commit is contained in:
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
2019-06-24 18:20:01 +02:00
parent b81b40d4c4
commit 44e891bbf6
+34 -34
View File
@@ -499,7 +499,7 @@ int manager_rtnl_process_address(sd_netlink *rtnl, sd_netlink_message *message,
if (sd_netlink_message_is_error(message)) {
r = sd_netlink_message_get_errno(message);
if (r < 0)
log_warning_errno(r, "rtnl: failed to receive address, ignoring: %m");
log_warning_errno(r, "rtnl: failed to receive address message, ignoring: %m");
return 0;
}
@@ -509,49 +509,49 @@ int manager_rtnl_process_address(sd_netlink *rtnl, sd_netlink_message *message,
log_warning_errno(r, "rtnl: could not get message type, ignoring: %m");
return 0;
} else if (!IN_SET(type, RTM_NEWADDR, RTM_DELADDR)) {
log_warning("rtnl: received unexpected message type when processing address, ignoring");
log_warning("rtnl: received unexpected message type %d when processing address, ignoring.", type);
return 0;
}
r = sd_rtnl_message_addr_get_ifindex(message, &ifindex);
if (r < 0) {
log_warning_errno(r, "rtnl: could not get ifindex from address, ignoring: %m");
log_warning_errno(r, "rtnl: could not get ifindex from message, ignoring: %m");
return 0;
} else if (ifindex <= 0) {
log_warning("rtnl: received address message with invalid ifindex, ignoring: %d", ifindex);
return 0;
} else {
r = link_get(m, ifindex, &link);
if (r < 0 || !link) {
/* when enumerating we might be out of sync, but we will
* get the address again, so just ignore it */
if (!m->enumerating)
log_warning("rtnl: received address for nonexistent link (%d), ignoring", ifindex);
return 0;
}
}
r = link_get(m, ifindex, &link);
if (r < 0 || !link) {
/* when enumerating we might be out of sync, but we will get the address again, so just
* ignore it */
if (!m->enumerating)
log_warning("rtnl: received address for link %d we don't know about, ignoring", ifindex);
return 0;
}
r = sd_rtnl_message_addr_get_family(message, &family);
if (r < 0 || !IN_SET(family, AF_INET, AF_INET6)) {
log_link_warning(link, "rtnl: received address with invalid family, ignoring");
log_link_warning(link, "rtnl: received address message with invalid family, ignoring.");
return 0;
}
r = sd_rtnl_message_addr_get_prefixlen(message, &prefixlen);
if (r < 0) {
log_link_warning_errno(link, r, "rtnl: received address with invalid prefixlen, ignoring: %m");
log_link_warning_errno(link, r, "rtnl: received address message with invalid prefixlen, ignoring: %m");
return 0;
}
r = sd_rtnl_message_addr_get_scope(message, &scope);
if (r < 0) {
log_link_warning_errno(link, r, "rtnl: received address with invalid scope, ignoring: %m");
log_link_warning_errno(link, r, "rtnl: received address message with invalid scope, ignoring: %m");
return 0;
}
r = sd_rtnl_message_addr_get_flags(message, &flags);
if (r < 0) {
log_link_warning_errno(link, r, "rtnl: received address with invalid flags, ignoring: %m");
log_link_warning_errno(link, r, "rtnl: received address message with invalid flags, ignoring: %m");
return 0;
}
@@ -559,7 +559,7 @@ int manager_rtnl_process_address(sd_netlink *rtnl, sd_netlink_message *message,
case AF_INET:
r = sd_netlink_message_read_in_addr(message, IFA_LOCAL, &in_addr.in);
if (r < 0) {
log_link_warning_errno(link, r, "rtnl: received address without valid address, ignoring: %m");
log_link_warning_errno(link, r, "rtnl: received address message without valid address, ignoring: %m");
return 0;
}
@@ -568,7 +568,7 @@ int manager_rtnl_process_address(sd_netlink *rtnl, sd_netlink_message *message,
case AF_INET6:
r = sd_netlink_message_read_in6_addr(message, IFA_ADDRESS, &in_addr.in6);
if (r < 0) {
log_link_warning_errno(link, r, "rtnl: received address without valid address, ignoring: %m");
log_link_warning_errno(link, r, "rtnl: received address message without valid address, ignoring: %m");
return 0;
}
@@ -579,10 +579,8 @@ int manager_rtnl_process_address(sd_netlink *rtnl, sd_netlink_message *message,
}
r = in_addr_to_string(family, &in_addr, &buf);
if (r < 0) {
log_link_warning_errno(link, r, "Could not print address, ignoring: %m");
return 0;
}
if (r < 0)
log_link_warning_errno(link, r, "Could not print address: %m");
r = sd_netlink_message_read_cache_info(message, IFA_CACHEINFO, &cinfo);
if (r < 0 && r != -ENODATA) {
@@ -598,38 +596,40 @@ int manager_rtnl_process_address(sd_netlink *rtnl, sd_netlink_message *message,
switch (type) {
case RTM_NEWADDR:
if (address)
log_link_debug(link, "Updating address: %s/%u (valid %s%s)", buf, prefixlen,
log_link_debug(link, "Remembering updated address: %s/%u (valid %s%s)",
strnull(buf), prefixlen,
valid_str ? "for " : "forever", strempty(valid_str));
else {
/* An address appeared that we did not request */
r = address_add_foreign(link, family, &in_addr, prefixlen, &address);
if (r < 0) {
log_link_warning_errno(link, r, "Failed to add address %s/%u, ignoring: %m", buf, prefixlen);
log_link_warning_errno(link, r, "Failed to remember foreign address %s/%u, ignoring: %m",
strnull(buf), prefixlen);
return 0;
} else
log_link_debug(link, "Adding address: %s/%u (valid %s%s)", buf, prefixlen,
log_link_debug(link, "Remembering foreign address: %s/%u (valid %s%s)",
strnull(buf), prefixlen,
valid_str ? "for " : "forever", strempty(valid_str));
}
r = address_update(address, flags, scope, &cinfo);
if (r < 0) {
log_link_warning_errno(link, r, "Failed to update address %s/%u, ignoring: %m", buf, prefixlen);
return 0;
}
/* address_update() logs internally, so we don't need to. */
(void) address_update(address, flags, scope, &cinfo);
break;
case RTM_DELADDR:
if (address) {
log_link_debug(link, "Removing address: %s/%u (valid %s%s)", buf, prefixlen,
log_link_debug(link, "Forgetting address: %s/%u (valid %s%s)",
strnull(buf), prefixlen,
valid_str ? "for " : "forever", strempty(valid_str));
(void) address_drop(address);
} else
log_link_warning(link, "Removing non-existent address: %s/%u (valid %s%s), ignoring", buf, prefixlen,
valid_str ? "for " : "forever", strempty(valid_str));
log_link_info(link, "Kernel removed an address we don't remember: %s/%u (valid %s%s), ignoring.",
strnull(buf), prefixlen,
valid_str ? "for " : "forever", strempty(valid_str));
break;
default:
assert_not_reached("Received invalid RTNL message type");
}