rules: provide /dev/raw/rawctl

On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 01:26, Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 12:39:16AM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 00:26, Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com> wrote:

>> >  The upstream raw(8) command supports /dev/rawctl and also
>> >  /dev/raw/rawctl.  I think it makes more sense to use raw/rawctl when
>> >  you have all your raw devices in raw/ subdirectory (e.g. /dev/raw/raw<N>).
>>
>> The raw tool looks for /dev/rawctl first and the fallback to
>> /dev/raw/rawctl is named DEVFS_*. Should we turn that order around and
>> remove the devfs notion from the raw tool and let udev create a
>> dev/raw/rawctl node?
>
>  Yeah. Fixed, committed and pushed.
>
>  $ strace -e open ./raw
>  open("/dev/raw/rawctl", O_RDWR)         = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
>  open("/dev/rawctl", O_RDWR)             = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
>
>  I have also removed the #ifdef OLD_RAW_DEVS (/dev/raw<N>) junk.
This commit is contained in:
Kay Sievers
2008-12-26 01:41:36 +01:00
parent 58dc66fdb7
commit 49bb7a8a2a
+1 -1
View File
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ KERNEL=="ht[0-9]*|nht[0-9]*", GROUP="disk"
KERNEL=="pg[0-9]*", GROUP="disk"
KERNEL=="pt[0-9]*|npt[0-9]*", GROUP="disk"
KERNEL=="qft[0-9]*|nqft[0-9]*|zqft[0-9]*|nzqft[0-9]*|rawqft[0-9]*|nrawqft[0-9]*", GROUP="disk"
KERNEL=="rawctl", GROUP="disk"
KERNEL=="rawctl", NAME="raw/rawctl", GROUP="disk"
SUBSYSTEM=="raw", KERNEL=="raw[0-9]*", NAME="raw/%k", GROUP="disk"
KERNEL=="pktcdvd[0-9]*", NAME="pktcdvd/%k"
KERNEL=="pktcdvd", NAME="pktcdvd/control"