tpm2-util: refuse NvPCR extend when the NV index is gone
tpm2_index_to_handle() returns 0 with a NULL handle when the NV index is not present on the TPM. tpm2_nvpcr_extend_bytes() only checked for r < 0, so a tombstoned NvPCR (anchor file present, NV slot cleared out from under us) passed the NULL handle to tpm2_extend_nvpcr_nv_index() and aborted the process via its assert(). Handle r == 0 explicitly, as the other tpm2_index_to_handle() callers already do. The newly introduced -ENODEV is mapped together with -ENOENT to the io.systemd.PCRExtend.NoSuchNvPCR varlink error. Signed-off-by: Paul Meyer <katexochen0@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -465,7 +465,7 @@ static int vl_method_extend(sd_varlink *link, sd_json_variant *parameters, sd_va
|
||||
|
||||
if (p.nvpcr) {
|
||||
r = extend_nvpcr_now(p.nvpcr, extend_iovec->iov_base, extend_iovec->iov_len, p.event_type);
|
||||
if (r == -ENOENT)
|
||||
if (IN_SET(r, -ENOENT, -ENODEV))
|
||||
return sd_varlink_error(link, "io.systemd.PCRExtend.NoSuchNvPCR", NULL);
|
||||
} else
|
||||
r = extend_pcr_now(INDEX_TO_MASK(uint32_t, p.pcr), extend_iovec->iov_base, extend_iovec->iov_len, p.event_type);
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -7451,6 +7451,10 @@ int tpm2_nvpcr_extend_bytes(
|
||||
&nv_handle);
|
||||
if (r < 0)
|
||||
return log_debug_errno(r, "Failed to acquire handle to NV index 0x%" PRIu32 ".", p.nv_index);
|
||||
if (r == 0)
|
||||
return log_debug_errno(SYNTHETIC_ERRNO(ENODEV),
|
||||
"NvPCR '%s' is anchored but its NV index 0x%" PRIx32 " is no longer present on the TPM, refusing extend.",
|
||||
name, p.nv_index);
|
||||
|
||||
log_debug("Successfully acquired handle to existing NV index 0x%" PRIx32 ".", p.nv_index);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user