test: avoid NO_CAST.INTEGER_OVERFLOW in test-oomd-util (#30365)
The `.mem_total` variable has `uint64_t` type, therefore, when multiplying the number `20971512` by the number `1024` with the suffix `U`, we will not get the expected result of `21,474,828,288`, since the number `20971512` without an explicit type indication has `uint32_t` type. First, multiplication will occur in accordance with the `uint32_t` type; this operation will cause a **type overflow**, and only then will this result be assigned to a `uint64_t` type variable. It's worth adding the `UL` suffix to the number `20971512` to avoid **overflow**. Found by Linux Verification Center (portal.linuxtesting.ru) with SVACE. Author A. Slepykh.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -291,19 +291,19 @@ static void test_oomd_pressure_above(void) {
|
||||
|
||||
static void test_oomd_mem_and_swap_free_below(void) {
|
||||
OomdSystemContext ctx = (OomdSystemContext) {
|
||||
.mem_total = 20971512 * 1024U,
|
||||
.mem_used = 3310136 * 1024U,
|
||||
.swap_total = 20971512 * 1024U,
|
||||
.swap_used = 20971440 * 1024U,
|
||||
.mem_total = UINT64_C(20971512) * 1024U,
|
||||
.mem_used = UINT64_C(3310136) * 1024U,
|
||||
.swap_total = UINT64_C(20971512) * 1024U,
|
||||
.swap_used = UINT64_C(20971440) * 1024U,
|
||||
};
|
||||
assert_se(oomd_mem_available_below(&ctx, 2000) == false);
|
||||
assert_se(oomd_swap_free_below(&ctx, 2000) == true);
|
||||
|
||||
ctx = (OomdSystemContext) {
|
||||
.mem_total = 20971512 * 1024U,
|
||||
.mem_used = 20971440 * 1024U,
|
||||
.swap_total = 20971512 * 1024U,
|
||||
.swap_used = 3310136 * 1024U,
|
||||
.mem_total = UINT64_C(20971512) * 1024U,
|
||||
.mem_used = UINT64_C(20971440) * 1024U,
|
||||
.swap_total = UINT64_C(20971512) * 1024U,
|
||||
.swap_used = UINT64_C(3310136) * 1024U,
|
||||
};
|
||||
assert_se(oomd_mem_available_below(&ctx, 2000) == true);
|
||||
assert_se(oomd_swap_free_below(&ctx, 2000) == false);
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user