resolved: fully follow CNAMEs in the DNS stub after all
In 2f4d8e577c I argued that following
CNAMEs in the stub is not necessary anymore. However, I think it' better
to revert to the status quo ante and follow it after all, given it is
easy for us and makes sure our D-Bus/varlink replies are more similar to
our DNS stub replies that way, and we save clients potential roundtrips.
Hence, whenever we hit a CNAME/DNAME redirect, let's restart the query
like we do for the D-Bus/Varlink case, and collect replies as we go.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -586,13 +586,6 @@ static int dns_stub_send_reply(
|
||||
|
||||
edns0_do = dns_stub_reply_with_edns0_do(q); /* let's check if we shall reply with EDNS0 DO? */
|
||||
|
||||
r = dns_stub_assign_sections(
|
||||
q,
|
||||
q->request_packet->question,
|
||||
edns0_do);
|
||||
if (r < 0)
|
||||
return log_debug_errno(r, "Failed to assign sections: %m");
|
||||
|
||||
r = dns_stub_make_reply_packet(
|
||||
&reply,
|
||||
DNS_PACKET_PAYLOAD_SIZE_MAX(q->request_packet),
|
||||
@@ -743,13 +736,37 @@ static void dns_stub_query_complete(DnsQuery *q) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Note that we don't bother with following CNAMEs here. We propagate the authoritative/additional
|
||||
* sections from the upstream answer however, hence if the upstream server collected that information
|
||||
* already we don't have to collect it ourselves anymore. */
|
||||
/* Take all data from the current reply, and merge it into the three reply sections we are building
|
||||
* up. We do this before processing CNAME redirects, so that we gradually build up our sections, and
|
||||
* and keep adding all RRs in the CNAME chain. */
|
||||
r = dns_stub_assign_sections(
|
||||
q,
|
||||
q->request_packet->question,
|
||||
dns_stub_reply_with_edns0_do(q));
|
||||
if (r < 0) {
|
||||
log_debug_errno(r, "Failed to assign sections: %m");
|
||||
dns_query_free(q);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
switch (q->state) {
|
||||
|
||||
case DNS_TRANSACTION_SUCCESS:
|
||||
r = dns_query_process_cname(q);
|
||||
if (r == -ELOOP) { /* CNAME loop, let's send what we already have */
|
||||
log_debug_errno(r, "Detected CNAME loop, returning what we already have.");
|
||||
(void) dns_stub_send_reply(q, q->answer_rcode);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (r < 0) {
|
||||
log_debug_errno(r, "Failed to process CNAME: %m");
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (r == DNS_QUERY_RESTARTED)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
_fallthrough_;
|
||||
|
||||
case DNS_TRANSACTION_RCODE_FAILURE:
|
||||
(void) dns_stub_send_reply(q, q->answer_rcode);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
@@ -888,7 +905,6 @@ static void dns_stub_process_query(Manager *m, DnsStubListenerExtra *l, DnsStrea
|
||||
r = dns_query_new(m, &q, p->question, p->question, NULL, 0,
|
||||
SD_RESOLVED_PROTOCOLS_ALL|
|
||||
SD_RESOLVED_NO_SEARCH|
|
||||
SD_RESOLVED_NO_CNAME|
|
||||
(DNS_PACKET_DO(p) ? SD_RESOLVED_REQUIRE_PRIMARY : 0)|
|
||||
SD_RESOLVED_CLAMP_TTL);
|
||||
if (r < 0) {
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user