network/routing-policy-rule: fix compare func

Previously, when comparing an existing and requested routing policy
rules, `all` flag was unset, thus the from and to addresses in the two
rules were not compared. Hence, a new request with from and/or to
addresses might be considered as it already exists even the addresses of
existing one were different from the newly requested one.

All existing rules have valid family, i.e. AF_INET or AF_INET6. And,
all requesting rules with from and/or to addresses also have a valid
family. Hence, even `all` flag is unset, the addresses can be and must
be compared in that case.

Fixes a regression caused by fc58350aa4 (v257).
Fixes #35874.
This commit is contained in:
Yu Watanabe
2025-02-05 09:14:54 +09:00
parent 060676871e
commit bc45d9c959
+1 -1
View File
@@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ static int routing_policy_rule_compare_func_full(const RoutingPolicyRule *a, con
if (r != 0)
return r;
if (all) {
if (a->family == b->family && a->family != AF_UNSPEC) {
r = memcmp(&a->from.address, &b->from.address, FAMILY_ADDRESS_SIZE(a->family));
if (r != 0)
return r;