This code was partially broken, since the firmware directory was
undefined. Also, some of the parts were a dead code, since they relied
on code from the original dracut test suite.
`command -v <bin> | grep ...` can under certain conditions cause the
`command` to exit with SIGPIPE, which in combination with `set -o
pipefail` means that the tests sometimes randomly die during setup.
Let's avoid using pipes in such cases.
This breaks some existing loops which previously ignored if the piped
program exited with EC >0. Rewrite them to mitigate this (and also make
them more robust in some cases).
This fixes maybe-uninitialized warning:
```
../src/basic/fileio.c: In function ‘chase_symlinks_and_fopen_unlocked’:
../src/basic/fileio.c:1026:19: warning: ‘f’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
1026 | *ret_file = f;
| ~~~~~~~~~~^~~
```
Try to make this more manageable by reording:
- dependencies / inputs
(with subcategory of compression libraries)
- major components / outputs
- optional features / conditionals that don't fit into the two above categories
The division isn't well defined, because libraries often correspond one-to-one
to feature, but not always.
The test appears to be occasionally failing. It uses systemd-run to echo
'hello world' into a namespaced journal and then uses journalctl to look for it,
but it doesn't wait.
In the failed runs it can't find it, but the automated journal dump shows
the message at the end.
Use --wait to avoid races.
As @yuwata correctly points out, this became broken when log_debug()
started returning -EIO. I wanted to preserve this pattern, but it turns
out it is not very widely used, and preserving it would make the whole
thing, already quite complicated, even more complex.
log_debug() is made like log_info() and friends, and returns void.
Let's assert if we ever happen to pass 0 to one of the log functions.
With the preceding commit to return -EIO from log_*(), passing 0 wouldn't
affect the return value any more, but it is still most likely an error.
The unit test code is an exception: we fairly often pass the return value
to print it, before checking what it is. So let's assert that we're not
passing 0 in non-test code. As with the previous check for %m, this is only
done in developer mode. We are depending on external code setting
errno correctly for us, which might not always be true, and which we can't
test, so we shouldn't assert, but just handle this gracefully.
I did a bunch of greps to try to figure out if there are any places where
we're passing 0 on purpose, and couldn't find any.
The one place that failed in tests is adjusted.
About "zerook" in the name: I wanted the suffix to be unambiguous. It's a
single "word" because each of the words in log_full_errno is also meaningful,
and having one term use two words would be confusing.
This is only done in developer mode. It is a pretty rare occurence that we
make this kind of mistake. And even if it happens, the result is just a misleading
error message. So let's only do the check in non-release builds.
Frantisek Sumsal
Yu Watanabe
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Anita Zhang
Aakash Singh
Lennart Poettering
Luca Boccassi
simmon
Luca Boccassi
Sevan Janiyan