The timeout wasn't working when settle was run as root:
# udevadm control --stop-exec-queue
# udevadm trigger
# udevadm settle --timeout=1
... (hangs)
Signed-off-by: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
The introduction of the --resolve-names=early/never code introduced a
bug to the OWNER/GROUP lookup. Previously if the name had contained $,
lookup would have been performed later; after the patch, the key ended
up being ignored!
<Keybuk> kay: udev git head ftbfs
<Keybuk> udev-watch.o: In function `udev_selinux_init':
<Keybuk> /../udev/udev.h:130: multiple definition of `udev_selinux_init'
UDev follows the kernel given name, and re-uses the kernel created
device node. If the kernel and spcecified udev rules disagree, the
udev specified node node is created and the kernel-created on is
deleted.
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 22:17, Omair Eshkenazi <stimpson@phys.huji.ac.il> wrote:
> I noticed that in (70-)persistent-net.rules, the comments for USB devices
> are missing the device/vendor id's. Example:
> # USB device 0x:0x (rt73usb)
I don't see any security implications, to be actually useful,
/dev/cpu/<n>/cpuid should be world readable. The cpuid instruction
can be called from userspace anyway, so there is nothing to hide.
The device does not support any write operation, so 0444 should
suffice.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@amd.com>
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:39, Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk> wrote:
> I'm puzzled by this function:
>
> /* if we have not seen this seqnum, check if it is/was already queued */
> if (seqnum < udev_queue->last_seen_udev_seqnum) {
> udev_queue_get_udev_seqnum(udev_queue);
> if (seqnum < udev_queue->last_seen_udev_seqnum)
>
> Shouldn't the test be (seqnum > udev_queue->last_seen_udev_seqnum) ?
Alan Jenkins
Kay Sievers
Scott James Remnant
Lubomir Rintel
Andre Przywara