tunaichao 2e44ad8dbd core: derive restrict-fsaccess initramfs_s_dev offset from skeleton
Building with -Dbpf=enabled -Dbpf_compiler=gcc (GCC's BPF backend) fails on
the static assertions in bpf-restrict-fsaccess.c, introduced in 68fe7fa4d6:

  error: static assertion failed:
  "offsetof(struct restrict_fsaccess_bss, initramfs_s_dev) ==
   offsetof(typeof_field(struct restrict_fsaccess_bpf, bss[0]), initramfs_s_dev)"

The hand-written struct restrict_fsaccess_bss lists the BPF .bss globals in
source declaration order and asserts that its layout matches the skeleton's
generated bss struct. bpftool gen skeleton emits that struct from the BTF
.bss DATASEC, whose member order reflects the physical order the compiler
placed the variables, not the source order. clang preserves declaration
order, so the asserts pass; gcc reorders .bss globals, so initramfs_s_dev no
longer sits at offset 0 and the asserts fail.

This is more than a build break: restrict_fsaccess_clear_initramfs_trust()
clears initramfs_s_dev by mmap()ing the .bss map and storing 0 at a hardcoded
offset 0. Under the gcc layout that store would clobber the wrong global,
silently leaving the initramfs trust window open after switch_root instead of
closing it. The asserts were correctly catching this.

Fix it by deriving the offset from the generated skeleton instead of a mirror
struct: drop struct restrict_fsaccess_bss and the four field-order
assert_cc()s, take INITRAMFS_S_DEV_OFF from the skeleton's bss struct
(offsetof(typeof_field(struct restrict_fsaccess_bpf, bss[0]),
initramfs_s_dev)), and store at p + INITRAMFS_S_DEV_OFF. The offset is a
compile-time constant, so clang (offset 0) is unchanged while gcc tracks the
real layout. A retained assert_cc() documents the 4-byte alignment the
single-store atomicity relies on.

Fixes: #42689
2026-06-24 13:42:30 +08:00
…
…
2026-04-18 14:24:47 +01:00
…
…
2026-06-17 09:59:34 +00:00
2026-03-06 08:55:55 +01:00
…
2026-06-22 10:39:36 +02:00
2026-06-23 23:10:02 +02:00

Systemd

System and Service Manager

OBS Packages Status
Semaphore CI 2.0 Build Status
Coverity Scan Status
OSS-Fuzz Status
CIFuzz
CII Best Practices
Fossies codespell report
Translation status
Coverage Status
Packaging status
OpenSSF Scorecard

Details

Most documentation is available on systemd's web site.

Assorted, older, general information about systemd can be found in the systemd Wiki.

Information about build requirements is provided in the README file.

Consult our NEWS file for information about what's new in the most recent systemd versions.

Please see the Code Map for information about this repository's layout and content.

Please see the Hacking guide for information on how to hack on systemd and test your modifications.

Please see our Contribution Guidelines for more information about filing GitHub Issues and posting GitHub Pull Requests.

When preparing patches for systemd, please follow our Coding Style Guidelines.

If you are looking for support, please contact our mailing list, join our IRC channel #systemd on libera.chat or Matrix channel

Stable branches with backported patches are available in the stable repo.

We have a security bug bounty program sponsored by the Sovereign Tech Fund hosted on YesWeHack

Repositories with distribution packages built from git main are available on OBS, and also repositories with packages built from the latest stable release

S
Description
systemd patched fork
Readme Cite this repository
409 MiB
Languages
C 88.5%
Shell 5.7%
Python 4.6%
Meson 1.1%