Franck Bui
4470860388
The code make the following assertion: when freeing a event loop object
(usually it's done after exiting from the main event loop), no signal events
are still queued and are pending.
This assertion can be found in event_unmask_signal_data() with
"assert(!d->current);" assertion.
It appears that this assertion can be wrong at least in a specific case
described below.
Consider the following example which is inspired from udev: a process defines 3
source events: 2 are created by sd_event_add_signal() and 1 is created by
sd_event_add_post().
1. the process receives the 2 signals consecutively so that signal 'A' source
event is queued and pending. Consequently the post source event is also
queued and pending. This is done by sd_event_wait().
2. The callback for signal 'A' is called by sd_event_dispatch().
3. The next call to sd_event_wait() will queue signal 'B' source event.
4. The callback for the post source event is called and calls sd_event_exit().
5. the event loop is exited.
6. freeing the event loop object will lead to the assertion failure in
event_unmask_signal_data().
This patch simply removes this assertion as it doesn't seem to be a
bug if the signal data still reference a signal source at this point.
systemd - System and Service Manager
Details
General information about systemd can be found in the systemd Wiki.
Information about build requirements are provided in the README file.
Consult our NEWS file for information about what's new in the most recent systemd versions.
Please see the HACKING file for information how to hack on systemd and test your modifications.
Please see our Contribution Guidelines for more information about filing GitHub Issues and posting GitHub Pull Requests.
When preparing patches for systemd, please follow our Coding Style Guidelines.
If you are looking for support, please contact our mailing list or join our IRC channel.