Lennart Poettering 9fac502920 nspawn,pid1: pass "inaccessible" nodes from cntr mgr to pid1 payload via /run/host
Let's make /run/host the sole place we pass stuff from host to container
in and place the "inaccessible" nodes in /run/host too.

In contrast to the previous two commits this is a minor compat break, but
not a relevant one I think. Previously the container manager would place
these nodes in /run/systemd/inaccessible/ and that's where PID 1 in the
container would try to add them too when missing. Container manager and
PID 1 in the container would thus manage the same dir together.

With this change the container manager now passes an immutable directory
to the container and leaves /run/systemd entirely untouched, and managed
exclusively by PID 1 inside the container, which is nice to have clear
separation on who manages what.

In order to make sure systemd then usses the /run/host/inaccesible/
nodes this commit changes PID 1 to look for that dir and if it exists
will symlink it to /run/systemd/inaccessible.

Now, this will work fine if new nspawn and new pid 1 in the container
work together. as then the symlink is created and the difference between
the two dirs won't matter.

For the case where an old nspawn invokes a new PID 1: in this case
things work as they always worked: the dir is managed together.

For the case where different container manager invokes a new PID 1: in
this case the nodes aren't typically passed in, and PID 1 in the
container will try to create them and will likely fail partially (though
gracefully) when trying to create char/block device nodes. THis is fine
though as there are fallbacks in place for that case.

For the case where a new nspawn invokes an old PID1: this is were the
(minor) incompatibily happens: in this case new nspawn will place the
nodes in the /run/host/inaccessible/ subdir, but the PID 1 in the
container won't look for them there. Since the nodes are also not
pre-created in /run/systed/inaccessible/ PID 1 will try to create them
there as if a different container manager sets them up. This is of
course not sexy, but is not a total loss, since as mentioned fallbacks
are in place anyway. Hence I think it's OK to accept this minor
incompatibility.
2020-08-20 10:17:52 +02:00
2020-07-23 16:44:09 +02:00
2020-07-01 17:44:20 +02:00
2019-04-12 08:30:31 +02:00
2020-07-12 22:00:16 +00:00
2019-04-12 08:30:31 +02:00
…
2020-08-01 11:54:26 +02:00
2020-08-19 10:18:33 +02:00
2020-06-16 13:34:04 +02:00
2020-08-19 10:04:08 +02:00

Systemd

System and Service Manager

Count of open issues over time Count of open pull requests over time Semaphore CI Build Status
Coverity Scan Status
OSS-Fuzz Status
CIFuzz
CII Best Practices
Travis CI Build Status
Language Grade: C/C++
CentOS CI Build Status
Build Status
Fossies codespell report
Packaging status

Details

Most documentation is available on systemd's web site.

Assorted, older, general information about systemd can be found in the systemd Wiki.

Information about build requirements is provided in the README file.

Consult our NEWS file for information about what's new in the most recent systemd versions.

Please see the Hacking guide for information on how to hack on systemd and test your modifications.

Please see our Contribution Guidelines for more information about filing GitHub Issues and posting GitHub Pull Requests.

When preparing patches for systemd, please follow our Coding Style Guidelines.

If you are looking for support, please contact our mailing list or join our IRC channel.

Stable branches with backported patches are available in the stable repo.

S
Description
systemd patched fork
Readme
409 MiB
Languages
C 88.5%
Shell 5.7%
Python 4.6%
Meson 1.1%