This ensures we don't erroneously assign pseudoterminals created by
terminal emulators that use utempter to register themselves in utmp when
run under a GUI session that doesn't have a TTY assigned.
With these two changes the vscode parser works nicely again. Once the
EDG frontend adds support for this feature I'll fix it to check for the
fixed version like for GCC.
Some device node refuses to be opened with read-write mode.
Let's not open with O_RDWR, but open with O_PATH, and use
FORMAT_PROC_FD_PATH().
Follow-up for 1abb592f2f.
Fixes#38033.
It declares STDC_VERSION 202311L but still doesn't support this feature:
https://en.cppreference.com/w/c/compiler_support/23
The EDG frontend is used by intellisense, which is the default
engine in VSCode, so parsing is currently broken and tons of
spurious errors are shown. Skip this feature when this
compiler frontend is used.
Follow-up for 92100f14c3
We recently added a new set of assertion macros such as ASSERT_GE,
ASSERT_OK, ASSERT_EQ, ... which show not only the expression that failed
but also the values of the arguments of the expression. Let's use them.
- use STRV_MAKE() macro,
- add several missing assertions,
- use more suitable ASSERT_XYZ() macros,
- drop TEST(dns_search_domain_unlink_all), as it is already tested in
TEST(dns_search_domain_new_system_limit).
Let's tighten the rules for picking up TTY information from utmp: let's
do so only for TTY session, nothing else. Apparently people have issues
with graphical sessions with certain terminal emulators that install
entries in utmp for each emulator window.
Alternative for: #38027
Prefixes would be nice, but they appear to be very buggy.
A few examples:
- `udevadm test-builtin net_setup_link /sys<TAB><TAB>`: `/sysblock/`
- `udevadm test-builtin net_setup_link /sys/<TAB><TAB>`: `/sys/bin/`
- `journalctl /dev<TAB>`: `/dev//dev/`
This ensures we don't erroneously assign pseudoterminals created by
terminal emulators that use utempter to register themselves in utmp when
run under a GUI session that doesn't have a TTY assigned.
The tests are written and consumed by developers. Errno descriptions are good
for users, but for developers the errno "name" is actually more useful, and
we need to always map the description back to the name to compare with the
code. Let's make things simpler for ourselves by printing the errno names
directly.
Example output:
src/test/test-tests.c:15: Assertion failed: Expected "-1" to succeed, but got error: -1/EPERM
src/test/test-tests.c:16: Assertion failed: Expected "-ENOANO" to succeed, but got error: -55/ENOANO
src/test/test-tests.c:20: Assertion failed: Expected "0" to be positive, but it is zero.
src/test/test-tests.c:62: Assertion failed: Expected "RET_NERRNO(mkdir("/i/will/fail/with/enoent", 666))" to fail with error -55/ENOANO, but got -2/ENOENT
src/test/test-tests.c:68: Assertion failed: Expected "0" to fail with errno 2/ENOENT, but it succeeded
src/test/test-tests.c:70: Assertion failed: Expected "mkdir("/i/will/fail/with/enoent", 666)" to fail with errno 55/ENOANO, but got 2/ENOENT
In https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/38003, one test failed:
Unit tests / build (CLANG_ASAN_UBSAN):
src/test/test-cgroup-util.c:237: Assertion failed: Expected "r" to succeed, but got error: No such device or address
Checks for specific errors were added in ca82f0cbe2,
partially relaxed in e92d699dde.
cg_pidref_get_unit() and cg_pid_get_slice() enter a deep chain of calls,
so it's hard to guess where the failure occurred. But those two calls
expect the cgroup path to be "well formed". When we're running in CI,
we don't have full control over what is happening on the machine,
so let's suppress that error too.
The error message is not always meaningful. Also, sometimes we care about the
sign of the value, and we ignore the sign of the error in the printing machinery.
The messages for errno are changed to say "errno" instead of "error". The problem with
the previous formalation is that our errors are always negative and errnos are
positive, so when we print the numerical value, we cannot use the word for both.
Example output:
src/test/test-tests.c:15: Assertion failed: Expected "-1" to succeed, but got error: -1/Operation not permitted
src/test/test-tests.c:16: Assertion failed: Expected "-ENOANO" to succeed, but got error: -55/No anode
src/test/test-tests.c:61: Assertion failed: Expected "0" to fail with error -2/"No such file or directory", but it succeeded
src/test/test-tests.c:62: Assertion failed: Expected "RET_NERRNO(mkdir("/i/will/fail/with/enoent", 666))" to fail with error -55/"No anode", but got the following error: -2/No such file or directory
src/test/test-tests.c:68: Assertion failed: Expected "0" to fail with errno 2/"No such file or directory", but it succeeded
src/test/test-tests.c:70: Assertion failed: Expected "mkdir("/i/will/fail/with/enoent", 666)" to fail with errno 55/"No anode", but got the following errno: 2/No such file or directory
We can do this for int types, i.e. the variants where we expect a
success/error code. The macros which do generating comparison operations
also support floats so we shouldn't use intmax_t there.
The code is shorter and calling printf once is certainly more efficient.
ephemeral/ephemeral-import are described as possible '--mutable' options but
not present in the list. Note, "systemd-sysext --help" lists them correctly.
